A. Shevchenko
To Win
F. Misolic
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W WForm
L W L W W L L L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Misolic winning 2 and Nagal winning 0. The last match between Misolic and Nagal was at the Monza Challenger, 08-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Filip Misolic getting the victory 6-2 1-0 ret..
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Filip Misolic | 1 |
Sumit Nagal | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Monza Challenger(08-04-2025)
Misolic | Stats | Nagal |
---|---|---|
71% (30-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (9-13) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
155 | Ranking | 170 |
126 | Highest Rank | 68 |
23 | Age | 27 |
- | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 15 |
62% (189-114) | Career Total W/L | 59% (340-236) |
$352,360 | Career Prize Money | $534,520 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
23 May 2025 / Q3
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 1-0 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
7 | Games Won | 2 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
0:42:2 | Average Match Time | 0:42:2 |
63% (20/32) | 1st Serve % | 70% (16/23) |
65% (13/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (2/7) |
100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
65% (15/23) | Return Points Win % | 38% (12/32) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Both Misolic and Nagal have struggled with their second serve performance over the last six months, winning 0% of points on their second serves. This statistic is crucial for match predictions as it often correlates highly with the likelihood of winning or losing a match.
In terms of return game effectiveness, neither player shows an edge as both have won 0% of their opponent's second serve points. Moreover, their first serve return statistics are equally lackluster, with both players winning 0% of points in this category. Such stats are highly indicative of who might be favored in their direct head-to-head competition.
When facing pressure moments, Misolic and Nagal have both saved 0% of breakpoints in recent months. This is a crucial factor for in-game betting predictions, providing insight into how each player might fare under tense conditions.
Analyzing their performance over the past year, Misolic has not secured any match wins, holding a win/loss record of 0-0. Similarly, Nagal has yet to secure a victory, mirroring Misolic's win/loss record. This provides an overall head-to-head prediction overview, which is critical for forecasting outcomes.
Looking at the quality of their opponents over the past 12 months, Misolic's and Nagal’s competition has been against players with average ranks that remain unspecified. This data can potentially shape expectations about their performance against different tiers of competitors.
Deciding set outcomes, which can significantly impact live predictions and betting, show Misolic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last year. Nagal shares a similar fate, with no wins in deciding sets in tour matches, reflecting resilience challenges.
Examining break point conversion rates in recent gameplay, Misolic has converted 0% of his opportunities, just as Nagal has with his chances to break opponents' serves. This aspect is telling for those interested in live betting tips, particularly during breakpoint scenarios.
Considering all these statistics, neither player has demonstrated effective play in any critical match aspect recently. If the stats remain consistent, it predicts a closely matched contest without a clear victor based on performance metrics. However, no conclusive prediction can be made without additional data from current event performances or improvements in their gameplay.
Misolic vs Nagal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Lukas Neumayer
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Liam Draxl
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Luca Van Assche
Player
Filip Misolic
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Max Houkes
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Guy Den Ouden
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Lukas Klein
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Mees Rottgering
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Sumit Nagal
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hugo Gaston
Player
Sumit Nagal
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Federico Iannaccone
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ergi Kirkin
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
124)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (189/114) | Win/Loss | 59% (340/236) |
58% (405/297) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (775/567) |
53% (3518/3148) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6564/5786) |
48% (20/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (98/75) |
67% (153/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (233/143) |
53% (16/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (9/16) |
0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
734 | Aces Total | 785 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
690 | Total Double Faults | 1238 |
1:32:42 | Average Match Time | 1:32:43 |
371.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 474.13 |
58% (11334/19574) | 1st Serve % | 68% (23944/35426) |
68% (7672/11334) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (15383/23944) |
51% (4166/8240) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5777/11468) |
44% (885/2008) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1856/4208) |
41% (7873/19282) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15576/36384) |
53% (9/8) | Slam W/L | 34% (10/19) |
40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) |
100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (4/4) |
62% (24/15) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (25/33) |
59% (83/58) | Challenger W/L | 58% (178/130) |
70% (69/30) | Futures W/L | 75% (117/39) |
63% (185/296) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (331/553) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (4/16) |
60% (51/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (84/145) |
70% (68/97) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (87/178) |
91% (167/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (355/300) |
9% (167/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (355/53) |
27% (135/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (221/40) |