Filip Misolic vs Kimmer Coppejans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W L W
Form
W L W W W W W W W LH2H: Misolic 2 - 1 Coppejans
They have played 7 sets in total, with Misolic winning 4 and Coppejans winning 3. The last match between Misolic and Coppejans was at the Zagreb Challenger, 14-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Filip Misolic getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Filip Misolic | 2 |
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Zagreb Challenger(14-05-2025)
Filip Misolic
Kimmer Coppejans
7
6
2
6
7
6
| Misolic | Stats | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (34-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (34-15) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 142 | Ranking | 237 |
| 126 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 23 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 17 |
| 63% (193-115) | Career Total W/L | 59% (479-335) |
| $520,360 | Career Prize Money | $337,830 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Hanfmann PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Filip Misolic
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Filip Misolic
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 32 | Games Won | 33 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:38:43 | Average Match Time | 1:38:43 |
| 62% (130/209) | 1st Serve % | 60% (111/186) |
| 64% (83/130) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (74/111) |
| 48% (38/79) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (37/75) |
| 53% (8/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 59% (10/17) |
| 40% (75/186) | Return Points Win % | 42% (88/209) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Misolic vs Coppejans Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Coppejans has achieved a win rate of 42.62% on second-serve points, slightly outpacing Misolic's 40.81%. How does this impact predictions? Historically, superior second serve performance correlates positively with increased match win probabilities.
- Return Game Stats: Coppejans shows an edge in return games, capturing 45.37% of opponents' second serve points compared to Misolic's 43.96%. For first serve returns, Coppejans again leads with 29.56%, while Misolic follows with 27.93%. This return proficiency could be a crucial factor in the upcoming match.
- Pressure Situations: Coppejans has managed to save 52.53% of breakpoints faced, marginally better than Misolic's 52.12%. This minor difference might play a key role during pivotal moments in the match.
- Annual Performance Overview: In the past year, Coppejans boasts a higher success rate, winning 74.29% of their matches, while Misolic stands at 63.79%. Might this indicate Coppejans as the more consistent performer?
- Preferred Surfaces: Coppejans performs best on Hard courts with a win rate of 62%, whereas Misolic excels on Clay surfaces with a 67% win rate. On Grass, both show vulnerabilities, with Misolic having yet to win a match.
- Tournament Level Experience: Both players compete predominantly at Challengers/ITF > $10K level, with Coppejans holding a slight edge, winning 65.85% of such matches against Misolic’s 60.98%.
- Head-to-Head Record: They are tied in head-to-head encounters, each having won once. Coppejans triumphed most recently on Hard courts, which could suggest a psychological edge.
- Opponent Quality: Misolic has faced tougher opponents on average, with an average rank of 262.22, compared to Coppejans’ 350.01. Does this signify Misolic being more battle-tested?
- Deciding Set Performance: Misolic shows superior performance in deciding sets, winning 74% versus Coppejans’ 60% over the last year, suggesting resilience in lengthy matches.
- Break Point Conversion: Coppejans converts break points at a rate of 40%, surpassing Misolic’s 36.47%, which could be critical when opportunities arise.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Coppejans and Misolic is set to be a closely contested battle. Examining recent performance, Coppejans shows a slight advantage in crucial areas such as second serve points and return game stats, which are vital components for securing wins.
While both display strong tournament level experiences, Coppejans has demonstrated consistency with a higher annual win rate. Moreover, their superior second serve and return game statistics suggest that they could exploit opportunities more effectively.
Although Coppejans tends to perform better under high-pressure situations with marginally better breakpoint saving and conversion rates, Misolic's resilience in deciding sets could present a challenge if the match extends to a decider.
Considering Coppejans' recent head-to-head success on Hard surfaces, they are deemed the likely victor in this encounter. Overall, Coppejans seems to have the edge, making them the probable winner for this match.
Misolic vs Coppejans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Filip Misolic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Filip Misolic
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
18 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Denis Shapovalov
63%
(
107 of
170)
1st Serve %
61%
(
111 of
182)
9
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
74%
(
79 of
107)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
75 of
111)
51%
(
32 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
35%
(
59 of
170)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
71 of
182)
182
Total Points Won
170
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) 4-6 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
67%
(
111 of
166)
1st Serve %
55%
(
71 of
129)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
80 of
111)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
57 of
71)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
33%
(
55 of
166)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
40 of
129)
151
Total Points Won
144
|
5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Lukas Neumayer
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Liam Draxl
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Filip Misolic
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Noel Larwig
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Herman Hoeyeraal
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Alex Barrena
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
56%
(
64 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dan Added
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Maxence Beauge
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Arthur Reymond
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (193/115) | Win/Loss | 59% (479/335) |
| 58% (415/303) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1088/851) |
| 53% (3604/3224) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9568/8588) |
| 48% (20/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (140/87) |
| 67% (157/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (319/203) |
| 53% (16/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 32% (17/36) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 762 | Aces Total | 2183 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 704 | Total Double Faults | 1849 |
| 1:33:38 | Average Match Time | 1:29:13 |
| 371.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.53 |
| 58% (11669/20102) | 1st Serve % | 64% (31994/49662) |
| 68% (7919/11669) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (21472/31994) |
| 51% (4263/8433) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8602/17668) |
| 44% (902/2053) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2413/5545) |
| 41% (8062/19787) | Return Points Win % | 42% (21296/50755) |
| 57% (12/9) | Slam W/L | 52% (35/32) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 62% (24/15) | Main Tour W/L | 28% (11/29) |
| 59% (84/58) | Challenger W/L | 57% (296/223) |
| 70% (69/30) | Futures W/L | 75% (134/44) |
| 63% (187/298) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (472/800) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 62% (55/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (119/218) |
| 70% (69/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (170/300) |
| 91% (170/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (446/374) |
| 9% (170/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (446/71) |
| 27% (137/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (368/104) |
Misolic vs. Coppejans Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
