Prediction of Filip Misolic [190th] vs Edas Butvilas [209th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W W W W L W W L
Form
W L W W W W W L L LHead-To-Head: Misolic 1 - 0 Butvilas
They have played 3 sets in total, with Misolic winning 2 and Butvilas winning 1. The last match between Misolic and Butvilas was at the Pau Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Filip Misolic getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Filip Misolic | 1 |
Edas Butvilas | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 7-5 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Edas Butvilas
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
1
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 14 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:8:20 | Average Match Time | 2:8:20 |
68% (65/96) | 1st Serve % | 60% (58/97) |
63% (41/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (39/58) |
65% (20/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
42% (41/97) | Return Points Win % | 36% (35/96) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Filip Misolic vs Edas Butvilas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Misolic 1 - 0 Butvilas
Editorial Prediction:
Predicting the Outcome of Upcoming Tennis Match
In analyzing the forthcoming tennis match, several insightful predictions can be made based on various statistics and indicators. Examining the second serve performance in recent form, Misolic has displayed a commendable performance, winning 47.97% of points on their second serve over the past six months. Butvilas, on the other hand, has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 47.53%. It is worth noting the substantial correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Delving further into return game statistics, recent data highlights that Misolic has triumphed in 47.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Butvilas has demonstrated even greater prowess, winning 50.45%. Similarly, in terms of first serve returns, Misolic has achieved a success rate of 34.45%, whereas Butvilas has accomplished 33.16%. These figures significantly contribute to evaluating the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
When assessing the ability to withstand pressure, Misolic has emerged successful in saving 56.78% of breakpoints in recent form. On the other hand, Butvilas has displayed an even higher level of resilience, saving 63.54%. This particular statistic holds great value when making in-game betting predictions.
A comprehensive overview of performance over the past year reveals that Misolic has clinched victory in 52.08% of their matches played, with a win/loss record of 25/23. Conversely, Butvilas boasts an impressive 67.05% win rate, with a remarkable win/loss record of 59/29. These statistics provide us with an overarching prediction of the head-to-head outcome.
Considering the influence of playing surface on performance, it is noteworthy that Misolic exhibits their greatest career win percentage on clay, with a remarkable 66% success rate (W/L 134/69). However, their performance on grass is less favorable, with a 0% win rate (W/L 0/2). On the other hand, Butvilas showcases their best career win percentage on hard courts, recording an impressive 63% triumph (W/L 44/26), while displaying a 0% win rate on grass (W/L 0/1).
An assessment of player level reveals that, in the past year, Misolic has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize fund of over $10K, garnering victory in 48.57% of matches played (W/L 17/18). Conversely, Butvilas has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize fund of $10K, amassing an outstanding 73.33% success rate (W/L 33/12). It is crucial to consider these statistics and compare them to predict the favored player, relative to the caliber of the event in which they have been competing.
Examining opponent quality stats, we observe that over the past 12 months, Misolic has faced opponents with an average rank of 278.33, while Butvilas has encountered players with an average rank of 345.49.
In a scenario where the match enters a deciding set, Misolic has demonstrated an impressive 63% success rate in such situations over the past year. Conversely, Butvilas has achieved a respectable 54% victory rate in all tour matches.
While past player performance serves as a valuable indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to assess the current event statistics for a player's current form. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below for up-to-date event details, particularly if the players have already participated in matches within the current event. Additionally, it is essential to consider certain players' performance tendencies at specific events to accurately comprehend the potential outcome.
A crucial statistic to examine for in-game live betting tips is the break point conversion rate. Recent figures indicate that Misolic has converted 40% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Butvilas has capitalized on 40.88% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This particular stat provides valuable insights for making informed in-game betting decisions when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Please note that this resource is intended for avid statisticians and enthusiasts.
Filip Misolic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Filip Misolic
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Federico Coria
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Filip Misolic
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Ugo Blanchet
46%
(
17 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
90%
(
18 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
4 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Matteo Martineau
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Edas Butvilas Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Edas Butvilas
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Cachin
Player
Edas Butvilas
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Harold Mayot
Player
Edas Butvilas
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Stuart Parker
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Zsombor Piros
57%
(
66 of
116)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Christoph Negritu
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Keegan Smith
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Remy Bertola
Player
Edas Butvilas
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Philip Henning
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (179/112) | Win/Loss | 59% (103/73) |
57% (385/291) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (241/180) |
53% (3365/3041) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2129/1910) |
0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
706 | Aces Total | 653 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
661 | Total Double Faults | 451 |
1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1:39:31 |
375.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 388.86 |
58% (10847/18755) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7167/11920) |
68% (7336/10847) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5055/7167) |
51% (3995/7908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2387/4753) |
44% (834/1897) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (501/1218) |
41% (7466/18393) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4738/11910) |
62% (175/284) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (100/173) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
59% (46/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (31/60) |
69% (66/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (31/66) |
90% (157/142) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (97/83) |
10% (157/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (97/14) |
27% (133/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (79/20) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...