F. Misolic
To Win
B. Yunchaokete
To Win
Filip Misolic vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L W W W
Form
L L W L W W W L W LH2H: Misolic 2 - 0 Carabelli
They have played 4 sets in total, with Misolic winning 4 and Carabelli winning 0. The last match between Misolic and Carabelli was at the Tiriac Open - Bucharest, 02-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Filip Misolic getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Filip Misolic | 2 |
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tiriac Open - Bucharest(02-04-2025)
Filip Misolic
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
6
3
6
1
| Misolic | Stats | Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (31-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (25-14) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 155 | Ranking | 52 |
| 126 | Highest Rank | 52 |
| 23 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 12 |
| 63% (190-114) | Career Total W/L | 63% (372-214) |
| $352,360 | Career Prize Money | $462,400 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Saville PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kostyuk VS Bejlek PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 6-3 5-3 ret. |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 23 | Games Won | 10 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:10:47 | Average Match Time | 1:10:47 |
| 68% (81/119) | 1st Serve % | 67% (64/95) |
| 70% (57/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (32/64) |
| 55% (21/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (14/31) |
| 89% (8/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 52% (49/95) | Return Points Win % | 34% (41/119) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Misolic vs Carabelli Match Preview :
Analyzing their current performances, Carabelli and Misolic present intriguing yet competitive statistics as they head into their next encounter. Observing recent service performance, Carabelli holds a slight edge with 43.82% of points won on their second serve over the last six months, marginally outpacing Misolic, who stands at 43.17%. A vital statistic, this often correlates with overall match outcomes.
Looking deeper into return game stats from recent form, Carabelli again pulls ahead by winning 48.47% of opponent's second serve points compared to Misolic's 43.58%. Regarding return on first serve points, Carabelli registers success at 29%, while Misolic follows closely with 26.94%. Such return efficiencies can be pivotal in forecasting who might emerge as the favorite in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, both players show near-identical resilience, with Carabelli saving 51.59% of breakpoints while Misolic saves 51.47%. However, Carabelli demonstrates superior breakpoint conversion rates at 34.9%, slightly exceeding Misolic's 33.04%. When it comes to overall match outcomes over the past year, Carabelli has secured 63.53% of victories, posting a win-loss record of 54/31, while Misolic claims 58.18% with a record of 32/23.
In terms of surface proficiency, both contenders boast their best career win percentages on clay—Carabelli at 65% (329/175 win-loss record) and Misolic slightly higher at 66% (140/72). Interestingly, neither player has had success on grass, each holding a 0% win percentage (0/2 record). Analyzing competition levels, Carabelli has excelled in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.55% of matches (41/14) in the past year, while Misolic achieved a 53.85% success rate (21/18) in similar events.
Evaluating direct head-to-head stats, Misolic has a psychological edge, having won their only previous encounter at the Miami Open, with a 6-3, 5-3 (ret.) result. Both players have not faced extreme set pressures against each other, as their last match did not require a decider. Such stats could dictate strategies if the upcoming match stretches to its limit. Nevertheless, historically, Misolic triumphs in 78% of all decisive sets over the last 12 months, which could weigh in significantly.
Furthermore, it's crucial to consider opponent quality, with Carabelli facing higher-ranked opponents on average (214.51) compared to Misolic (264.11). However, Carabelli's superior performance in high-pressure situations and better recent track record on clay combined with past head-to-head victory, tilts the prediction toward Misolic claiming the win in the upcoming match.
Misolic vs Carabelli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Filip Misolic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Lukas Neumayer
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Liam Draxl
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Filip Misolic
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Max Houkes
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Guy Den Ouden
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Lukas Klein
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Sebastian Baez
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
53 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
125)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
55 of
125)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luca Nardi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Otto Virtanen
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (190/114) | Win/Loss | 63% (372/214) |
| 58% (407/297) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (818/539) |
| 53% (3530/3156) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6757/5770) |
| 48% (20/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (35/30) |
| 67% (154/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (336/181) |
| 53% (16/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 736 | Aces Total | 1061 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 690 | Total Double Faults | 1293 |
| 1:32:40 | Average Match Time | 1:41:16 |
| 370.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 365.94 |
| 58% (11365/19624) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23535/37944) |
| 68% (7696/11365) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (15621/23535) |
| 51% (4177/8259) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7131/14408) |
| 44% (889/2020) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2016/4463) |
| 41% (7909/19359) | Return Points Win % | 43% (16590/38561) |
| 56% (10/8) | Slam W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 41% (7/10) |
| 100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (24/15) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (21/21) |
| 59% (83/58) | Challenger W/L | 66% (190/100) |
| 70% (69/30) | Futures W/L | 67% (146/72) |
| 63% (186/297) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (361/564) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 60% (51/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (81/146) |
| 70% (68/97) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (107/180) |
| 91% (168/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (343/305) |
| 9% (168/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (343/35) |
| 27% (135/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (243/66) |
Misolic vs. Carabelli Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
