Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Felix Corwin vs Jordan Parker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Corwin vs Parker analysis and find out who is favored!
Felix Corwin vs Jordan Parker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Corwin has won 47.26% of points on his second serve, while Parker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Corwin, in recent form, has won 51.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Parker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Corwin has saved 59.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Parker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Corwin has won 65% of matches played (W/L 39/ 21), with Parker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Corwin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 137/ 93). Parker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 29/ 45).
- Player level: In the last year, Corwin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66% of matches (W/L 33/ 17), where as Parker has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Corwin winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Corwin winning 2 and Parker winning 0. The last match between Corwin and Parker was at the M15 Cancun, 17-07-2019, First, Hard with Felix Corwin getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Corwin and Parker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Corwin winning 0 times and Parker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Corwin winning 0, and Parker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Corwin has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.7 while Parker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Corwin has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Parker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Corwin has converted 41.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Parker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Corwin 1 - 0 Parker
714
Rank
478
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
60% (218-147)
Career Total W/L
43% (54-71)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Felix Corwin | Jordan Parker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:0 | 1:49:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (34/55) | 64% (45/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (24/34) | 58% (26/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 36% (9/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (35/70) | 36% (20/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Felix Corwin
Player
Jordan Parker
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Felix Corwin | Jordan Parker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (26/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (249/241) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 86 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 94 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:18 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 148.7 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (882/1574) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (615/882) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (318/692) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (75/188) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (688/1628) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Felix Corwin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Jacob Brumm
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ezequiel Simonit
51%
(
59 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
45%
(
25 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ivan Denisov
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Garrett Johns
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
51 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
117
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Felix Corwin
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
63)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anthony Genov
Player
Felix Corwin
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordan Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kuang Qing Xu
Player
Jordan Parker
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jordan Parker
Player
Varun Jayaram
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 7-6(1) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-7(6) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anro Nel
Player
Jordan Parker
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jordan Parker
Player
Seth Seely
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jordan Parker
Player
Lloyd Segal
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Connor Kruger
Player
Jordan Parker
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
13
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jordan Parker
Player
Da-Niel Kotze
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Asaf Friedler
Player
Jordan Parker
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
3
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
8
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Corwin Vs Parker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
