Federico Salomone vs David Poljak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W W L L L W W L
Form
W W L W L L W W W LHead To Head: Salomone 0 - 1 Poljak
They have played 2 sets in total, with Salomone winning 0 and Poljak winning 2. The last match between Salomone and Poljak was at the M25 Trento, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with David Poljak getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Federico Salomone | 0 |
David Poljak | 1 |
M25 Trento(18-02-2025)
6
1
6
4
Salomone | Stats | Poljak |
---|---|---|
67% (2-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (15-7) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
N/A | Ranking | 896 |
Highest Rank | 370 | |
23 | Age | 28 |
- | Plays | R |
0 | Titles | 6 |
53% (67-59) | Career Total W/L | 55% (336-276) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Federico Salomone
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
5 | Games Won | 12 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:3:35 | Average Match Time | 1:3:35 |
51% (31/61) | 1st Serve % | 45% (22/49) |
71% (22/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 82% (18/22) |
30% (9/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (15/27) |
50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
33% (16/49) | Return Points Win % | 49% (30/61) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Salomone vs David Poljak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Federico Salomone 0 - 1 David Poljak
Predictions Theme: Insights about the Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Salomone has displayed a remarkable second serve performance, winning an impressive 51.81% of points. Conversely, Poljak has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 51.48%. This statistical measure exhibits a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Analyzing the return game stats from recent matches, Salomone has proven to be adept at seizing opportunities, winning 46.43% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Poljak has excelled in this aspect, securing a higher percentage of 53.25%. Similar patterns emerge when considering first serve returns, with Salomone attaining 34.51% and Poljak demonstrating competence with a rate of 30.19%. These metrics possess a strong correlation with determining the favored player in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When confronted with critical moments, Salomone has effectively saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form. Meanwhile, Poljak has displayed an even higher degree of resilience, with a saving rate of 57.36%. This valuable statistic serves as a useful tool for making informed predictions in in-game betting scenarios.
- Performance Overview: Assessing their overall performance in the past year, Salomone has emerged victorious in an impressive 63.64% of matches played (14 wins out of 22), while Poljak boasts a commendable win rate of 57.14% (28 wins out of 49). These figures provide a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
- Surface Specialization: Delving into each player's most favorable surfaces, Salomone exhibits mastery on I.hard courts, attaining a win percentage of 60% (9 wins out of 15). Conversely, Salomone struggles on Clay, with a modest win percentage of 41% (16 wins out of 39). In contrast, Poljak thrives on Hard courts, boasting a win percentage of 59% (108 wins out of 182). Conversely, Poljak faces challenges on Clay, achieving a win rate of 49% (109 wins out of 221).
- Player Level: Over the past year, Salomone has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, winning an impressive 70% of matches (14 wins out of 20). Similarly, Poljak has predominantly participated in the same level of tournaments, emerging victorious in 60.87% of matches (28 wins out of 46). When evaluating players' statistics to predict a favorite, it is essential to consider the relative event level they have been competing in.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Throughout the last 12 months, Salomone has faced opponents with an average ranking of 172.32. In contrast, Poljak has encountered players with an average ranking of 298.94. This insight into their respective opponents' quality provides valuable context for forecasting the match outcome.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, should this match escalate to a deciding set, Salomone has proven their competence by triumphing in 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months. Remarkably, Poljak boasts a matching rate of 50% in all matches played on tour. These statistics reveal crucial indicators for in-game predictions.
- Current Event H2H Statistics: While past performance is indeed vital in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to examine current event statistics to gain insights into players' current form. Therefore, it is pertinent to peruse the section below (if applicable) for detailed information on their performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players may exhibit enhanced performance at specific events, thus necessitating the incorporation of such factors when forecasting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Salomone has demonstrated efficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities, successfully capitalizing on 29.17% of such chances. Poljak, on the other hand, presents an even more impressive conversion rate, effectively seizing 40.61% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve. These figures carry significant weight when providing in-game live betting tips.
- If you are intrigued by models that meticulously predict tennis matches, then this article serves as an excellent point of embarkation. (Warning: Reserved for true connoisseurs of statistics.)
Federico Salomone Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Federico Salomone
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Salomone
Player
Alessandro Spadola
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Salomone
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
38%
(
19 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sergey Fomin
Player
Federico Salomone
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Salomone
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Royer
Player
Federico Salomone
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Salomone
Player
Filippo Giovannini
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Klintcharov
Player
Federico Salomone
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
43%
(
29 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Poljak
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Simon Reveniau
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-7(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Louis Larue
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Arthur Laborde
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
William Jucha
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
18 of
24)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jonas Schaer
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
2
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(3) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Hugo Ouzilou
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
55%
(
11 of
20)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
23
Total Points Won
13
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marvin Moeller
Player
David Poljak
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
David Poljak
Player
Federico Salomone
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
53% (67/59) | Win/Loss | 55% (336/276) |
55% (154/128) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (765/657) |
53% (1428/1284) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7020/6548) |
59% (42/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (108/74) |
41% (16/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (109/112) |
56% (9/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (118/89) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
268 | Aces Total | 2588 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
222 | Total Double Faults | 1598 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:23:11 |
218.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 516.19 |
55% (2631/4786) | 1st Serve % | 60% (21912/36729) |
67% (1774/2631) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (15358/21912) |
47% (1005/2155) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7179/14816) |
40% (184/460) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1489/3427) |
40% (1846/4649) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14115/35966) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/8) | Challenger W/L | 39% (44/69) |
57% (67/51) | Futures W/L | 59% (292/207) |
52% (64/123) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (331/606) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
48% (11/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (97/188) |
29% (9/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (104/203) |
86% (70/60) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (333/278) |
14% (70/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (333/55) |
13% (56/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (279/56) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...