Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Gaio vs Ruben Bemelmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Bemelmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Ruben Bemelmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 48.88% of points on his second serve, while Bemelmans has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 48.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bemelmans has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 58.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bemelmans has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 24/ 30), with Bemelmans winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 323/ 250), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 21/ 24), where as Bemelmans has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gaio winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Gaio winning 4 and Bemelmans winning 2. The last match between Gaio and Bemelmans was at the Rome 2 Challenger, 26-04-2021, First, Clay with Federico Gaio getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Bemelmans have played a deciding set 2 times, with Gaio winning 2 times and Bemelmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 0, and Bemelmans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.15 while Bemelmans has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bemelmans has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 32.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bemelmans has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gaio 2 - 0 Bemelmans
247
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
54% (515-433)
Career Total W/L
57% (552-419)
21% (3-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$1,013,488
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Federico Gaio | Ruben Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 28 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:4 | 1:46:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (101/160) | 66% (112/170) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (70/101) | 63% (70/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (26/59) | 47% (27/58) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (10/23) | 67% (8/12) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (73/170) | 40% (64/160) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 1-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Gaio | Ruben Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 21% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 24% (8/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (123/182) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.07 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (538/965) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (359/538) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (200/427) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (22/71) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (326/977) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 15% (2/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Federico Gaio
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Federico Gaio
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Karan Singh
43%
(
38 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Federico Gaio
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Federico Gaio
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaio Vs Bemelmans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
