Federico Gaio vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 49.8% of points on his second serve, while Decamps has won 51.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 48.51% of his opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 54.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.95% and 35.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 60.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 64.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 50.79% of matches played (W/L 32/ 31), with Decamps winning 60% (W/L 24/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 322/ 246), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 76/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25), where as Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 21/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gaio winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gaio winning 0 and Decamps winning 4. The last match between Gaio and Decamps was at the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger, 02-09-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Decamps have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gaio winning 0 times and Decamps 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 0, and Decamps 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.41 while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 246.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaio has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 36.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 42.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gaio 0 - 2 Decamps
13
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
212
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
681
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
55% (514-429)
Career Total W/L
63% (151-88)
22% (2-7)
YTD W/L
73% (8-3)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Federico Gaio | Gabriel Decamps |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
Games Won | 14 | 25 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:51 | 1:22:51 |
1st Serve % | 60% (63/105) | 60% (71/119) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (42/63) | 77% (55/71) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (19/42) | 56% (27/48) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 64% (7/11) |
Return Points W% | 31% (37/119) | 42% (44/105) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-5 |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Federico Gaio
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
5 Aces
5
5 Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
62 Total Points Won
52 | ||||
6-3 6-3 |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Federico Gaio
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2 Aces
4
4 Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64 Total Points Won
46 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Federico Gaio | Gabriel Decamps |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 22% (2/7) | 73% (8/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 24% (5/16) | 71% (17/7) |
Games Win/Loss | 40% (76/115) | 55% (135/109) |
Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 78% (7/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.34 |
Aces Total | 32 | 40 |
DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 29 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:9 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 297.56 | 289.09 |
1st Serve % | 55% (331/597) | 64% (420/660) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (223/331) | 72% (304/420) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (126/266) | 54% (129/240) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (13/37) | 34% (28/82) |
Return Pts W% | 34% (212/623) | 40% (291/719) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 13% (1/8) | 70% (7/10) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 80% (4/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 25% (4/1) |
Federico Gaio Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jurij Rodionov Player
Federico Gaio
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1 Aces
0
2 Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59 Total Points Won
39 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Enrico Dalla Valle Player
Federico Gaio
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3 Aces
3
2 Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
66 Total Points Won
55 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Gaio Player
Karan Singh
43%
(
38 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
5 Aces
10
6 Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
97 Total Points Won
87 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mukund Sasikumar Player
Federico Gaio
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
12 Aces
4
0 Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59 Total Points Won
34 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andre Ilagan Player
Federico Gaio
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0 Aces
7
0 Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
66 Total Points Won
54 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Omni Kumar Player
Federico Gaio
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4 Aces
0
1 Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61 Total Points Won
43 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jakub Mensik Player
Federico Gaio
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
9 Aces
0
2 Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
93 Total Points Won
75 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Federico Gaio Player
Laurent Lokoli
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
5 Aces
2
3 Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83 Total Points Won
74 | 4-6 6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Aleksandar Kovacevic Player
Federico Gaio
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
10 Aces
8
1 Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
94 Total Points Won
81 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gijs Brouwer Player
Federico Gaio
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
11 Aces
3
4 Double Faults
3
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
74 Total Points Won
61 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Gabriel Decamps Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Leopold Zima Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
11 Aces
2
2 Double Faults
6
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
92 Total Points Won
89 | 7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nam Hoang Ly Player
Gabriel Decamps
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10 Aces
5
1 Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
86 Total Points Won
79 | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Ye Cong Mo
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5 Aces
5
3 Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73 Total Points Won
58 | 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Jie Cui
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
5 Aces
7
2 Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
84 Total Points Won
66 | 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
F | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
SF |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Sander Jong
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
5 Aces
11
1 Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
17 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
69)
78 Total Points Won
63 | 7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
3 Aces
4
3 Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
66 Total Points Won
60 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Orel Kimhi
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2 Aces
0
3 Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
70 Total Points Won
50 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gabriel Decamps Player
Seungmin Park
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
5 Aces
4
3 Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
71 Total Points Won
76 | 1-6 7-5 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marcello Serafini Player
Gabriel Decamps
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
5 Aces
3
1 Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62 Total Points Won
45 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more