Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Delbonis vs Michal Przysiezny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Delbonis vs Przysiezny analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Delbonis vs Michal Przysiezny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Delbonis has won 46.67% of points on his second serve, while Przysiezny has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Delbonis, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Przysiezny has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.43% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Delbonis has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Przysiezny has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Delbonis has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 14/ 16), with Przysiezny winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Delbonis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 412/ 245), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 13). Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93).
- Player level: In the last year, Delbonis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13), where as Przysiezny has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Delbonis winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Delbonis winning 2 and Przysiezny winning 3. The last match between Delbonis and Przysiezny was at the Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai, 06-10-2013, Q3, Hard with Michal Przysiezny getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:37:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Delbonis and Przysiezny have played a deciding set 1 times, with Delbonis winning 1 times and Przysiezny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Delbonis winning 1, and Przysiezny 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Delbonis has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.53 while Przysiezny has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Delbonis has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Przysiezny has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Delbonis has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Przysiezny has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Delbonis 1 - 1 Przysiezny
351
Rank
33
High
33
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
56% (492-385)
Career Total W/L
56% (465-368)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,684,293
Career Prize Money
$403,630
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Delbonis VS Przysiezny H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Federico Delbonis | Michal Przysiezny |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 27 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:37:43 | 0:37:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (102/157) | 68% (103/152) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (75/102) | 76% (78/103) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (29/55) | 55% (27/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (47/152) | 34% (53/157) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Delbonis VS Przysiezny H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Federico Delbonis
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Federico Delbonis
Player
Michal Przysiezny
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Delbonis | Michal Przysiezny |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Federico Delbonis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Delbonis
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Delbonis
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Delbonis
Player
Blaise Bicknell
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Federico Delbonis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Federico Delbonis
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Federico Delbonis
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Federico Delbonis
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Federico Delbonis
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
17
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Federico Delbonis
82%
(
62 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Delbonis
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Delbonis Vs Przysiezny Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
