E. Coulibaly
To Win
F. Cina
To Win
Federico Cina vs Khumoun Sultanov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L L L W W
Form
L W L W L W L L L LH2H: Cina 1 - 0 Sultanov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cina winning 2 and Sultanov winning 0. The last match between Cina and Sultanov was at the Hersonissos 2 Challenger, 12-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Federico Cina getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Cina | 1 |
| Khumoun Sultanov | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Hersonissos 2 Challenger(12-03-2025)
Federico Cina
Khumoun Sultanov
7
6
6
0
| Cina | Stats | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (13-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (11-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 323 | Ranking | 224 |
| 323 | Highest Rank | 215 |
| 18 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 9 |
| 58% (46-33) | Career Total W/L | 62% (302-188) |
| $35,260 | Career Prize Money | $72,000 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-0 |
Stats 
Federico Cina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:36:50 | Average Match Time | 1:36:50 |
| 59% (41/70) | 1st Serve % | 63% (38/60) |
| 66% (27/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (18/38) |
| 45% (13/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 55% (33/60) | Return Points Win % | 43% (30/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cina vs Sultanov Match Preview :
Analyzing the current statistics for the upcoming tennis match provides insightful data that can guide predictions. In terms of second serve performance over the past six months, Cina has demonstrated a slightly superior record, winning 45.64% of points on their second serve compared to Sultanov's 43.91%. This aspect is crucial as it shows a strong correlation with accurate match outcomes.
Examining the return game stats, Cina again edges slightly ahead. Cina secured 47.92% of points on opponents' second serves, while Sultanov achieved a lower percentage of 44.09% in recent form. When considering first serve returns, the figures stand at 29.23% for Cina and 27.12% for Sultanov, adding weight to the matchup prediction favoring Cina.
Both players have demonstrated varying levels of resilience under pressure, which is vital for predicting match dynamics. Cina has saved 55.8% of breakpoints encountered recently, outperforming Sultanov's rate of 50.21%. This indicates Cina's slightly better ability to handle pressure situations effectively.
Looking at performance over the past year, Cina has won 62.26% of their matches, boasting a win-loss record of 33-20. Sultanov, on the other hand, has a higher win percentage of 72.63% and a record of 69-26. This offers a wider context for understanding their overall capabilities on court.
When it comes to surface preference, both players show their best performances on hard courts. Cina's career on hard surfaces shows a win rate of 61% (W/L 25/16), while Sultanov excels slightly more with a win rate of 67% (W/L 173/87). Conversely, Cina struggles more on clay and Sultanov on grass, which may affect their confidence on different surfaces.
At the player level, Cina has been playing most of their matches in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.22% of matches recently. Sultanov has shown a stronger recent form in the same category, with an impressive win rate of 80%. This highlights their relative experience and success at this competitive level.
Opponent quality also plays a significant role in shaping predictions. Cina has faced opponents with an average rank of 369.32 over the past 12 months, whereas Sultanov's opposition had a marginally higher average rank of 360.33. This points to the competitive nature of Sultanov's matches.
Deciding set performance is another key area to consider. Cina has been victorious in 60% of deciding sets over the last year, whereas Sultanov has an even higher success rate of 69%. This becomes crucial in tight matches that may go the distance.
Current event stats, though not provided here, are essential for assessing form and predicting outcomes, as players often perform variably depending on the specific event circumstances.
Focusing on breakpoint conversion is insightful, with Cina converting 40.7% of opportunities, significantly ahead of Sultanov's 29.11%. This indicates an opportunistic edge for Cina in critical game moments.
Considering these comprehensive statistics, the prediction leans towards Cina as the potential winner, given their higher consistency and remarkable statistics in crucial areas. However, Sultanov's strong match win percentage and performance in deciding sets suggest that it will be a competitive clash.
Cina vs Sultanov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Ilya Snitari
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Cina
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Federico Cina
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Federico Cina
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Khumoun Sultanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
16
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Lukas Klein
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (46/33) | Win/Loss | 62% (302/188) |
| 58% (101/74) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (659/448) |
| 52% (869/798) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5580/4734) |
| 63% (31/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (173/88) |
| 50% (15/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (87/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (41/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 186 | Aces Total | 1555 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 199 | Total Double Faults | 1025 |
| 1:41:9 | Average Match Time | 1:30:37 |
| 358.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 489.44 |
| 61% (3198/5247) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18255/29505) |
| 68% (2173/3198) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (12361/18255) |
| 51% (1044/2049) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5753/11251) |
| 42% (242/576) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1441/3217) |
| 41% (2251/5455) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12470/29827) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 48% (12/13) | Challenger W/L | 48% (67/73) |
| 65% (32/17) | Futures W/L | 69% (229/105) |
| 58% (45/77) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (300/486) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 77% (20/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (85/148) |
| 47% (9/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (72/127) |
| 85% (47/40) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (289/261) |
| 15% (47/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (289/28) |
| 19% (32/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (201/41) |
Cina vs. Sultanov Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
