Federico Cina vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W LH2H: Cina 1 - 0 Nava
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cina winning 2 and Nava winning 0. The last match between Cina and Nava was at the Bratislava 1 Challenger, 12-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Federico Cina getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Cina | 1 |
| Emilio Nava | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bratislava 1 Challenger(12-06-2025)
Federico Cina
Emilio Nava
7
6
6
3
| Cina | Stats | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (22-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (41-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 243 | Ranking | 123 |
| 243 | Highest Rank | 119 |
| 18 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 6 |
| 59% (55-38) | Career Total W/L | 59% (229-156) |
| $35,260 | Career Prize Money | $600,885 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shapovalov VS Walton PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boisson VS Yastremska PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Federico Cina
Player
Emilio Nava
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:17:56 | Average Match Time | 1:17:56 |
| 69% (42/61) | 1st Serve % | 63% (40/63) |
| 83% (35/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (32/40) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 35% (22/63) | Return Points Win % | 26% (16/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cina vs Nava Match Preview :
- In recent performance, Nava slightly edges Cina in second serve points, winning 46.14% compared to Cina's 44.5%. Does this indicate Nava's slight advantage in service games? Yes, it could.
- Regarding return games, Nava has shown superior performance, winning 47.23% of opponent's second serve points compared to Cina's 45.55%.
- On first serve returns, both players show comparable results with Cina at 25.41% and Nava at 25.26%.
- Both have equal breakpoint saving ability, with each saving 52.67% of breakpoints faced, highlighting their resilience under pressure.
- Over the past year, Cina has a higher win rate at 67.27% compared to Nava's 60.24%, implying greater match consistency.
- Cina's preferred surface is Hard courts, with the best career win percentage of 63%, whereas Nava excels on Clay courts with a 67% win rate.
- Cina's recent tournament level is generally Futures/ITF $10K events, winning 80% of these matches, while Nava competes more in Challengers/ITF > $10K, with a 66.67% success rate.
- In terms of opponent quality, Nava competes against higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 266.55, in contrast to Cina's average of 328.73.
- Cina has demonstrated a strong ability in deciding sets, winning 67% of them over the last year compared to Nava's 52%.
- Nava has a more effective breakpoint conversion rate at 35.91%, surpassing Cina's 29.13%, suggesting better opportunities capitalization.
Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match showcases two players with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Nava demonstrates a slight edge in second serve performance and return games, highlighting their ability to capitalize on opponents' serve weaknesses. Nava's ability to break serve more effectively also suggests a potential advantage during key moments in the match.
While Kina has a superior overall win rate in the past year, indicating consistency, their preference and stronger performances on Hard courts may not be an advantage if the match is played on Clay, Nava's strongest surface.
Considering the event level at which each player has competed recently, Nava's experience against tougher competition gives them a potential edge in adapting to higher-pressure situations. However, Kina's capability in deciding sets demonstrates their resilience and potential to turn matches in their favor.
Based on these factors, Nava appears to be the slight favorite to win the upcoming tennis match, given their superior performance against higher-ranked players and stronger ability to capitalize on breakpoint opportunities.
Cina vs Nava Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Cina
39%
(
23 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxim Mrva
Player
Federico Cina
44%
(
36 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Federico Cina
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Mili Poljicak
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Emilio Nava
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
61%
(
69 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
71 of
123)
14
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
53 of
71)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
37 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
43 of
123)
119
Total Points Won
117
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
46%
(
36 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
11
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
21
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jack Pinnington Jones
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
121)
26
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
84%
(
66 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
28%
(
31 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
44 of
121)
125
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(10) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (55/38) | Win/Loss | 59% (229/156) |
| 58% (120/88) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (510/396) |
| 52% (1049/951) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4597/4277) |
| 63% (33/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (91/74) |
| 54% (22/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (105/52) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 230 | Aces Total | 2309 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 238 | Total Double Faults | 1094 |
| 1:41:38 | Average Match Time | 1:37:16 |
| 351.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 367.69 |
| 61% (3869/6335) | 1st Serve % | 63% (16731/26736) |
| 68% (2648/3869) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11901/16731) |
| 51% (1247/2466) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5134/10005) |
| 42% (287/680) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (983/2354) |
| 41% (2677/6514) | Return Points Win % | 38% (10113/26798) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 54% (14/12) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (11/14) |
| 54% (21/18) | Challenger W/L | 62% (148/92) |
| 65% (32/17) | Futures W/L | 65% (48/26) |
| 59% (54/91) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (223/374) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 71% (25/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (82/168) |
| 54% (13/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (76/126) |
| 85% (55/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (215/185) |
| 15% (55/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (215/30) |
| 21% (38/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (170/43) |
Cina vs. Nava Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
