E. Coulibaly
To Win
F. Cina
To Win
Federico Cina vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L L L W W
Form
L W W L L L W W L LHead To Head: Cina 1 - 0 Wong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cina winning 2 and Wong winning 0. The last match between Cina and Wong was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Federico Cina getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Cina | 1 |
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(23-04-2025)
Federico Cina
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
7
6
6
1
| Cina | Stats | Wong |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (13-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (9-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 323 | Ranking | 175 |
| 323 | Highest Rank | 128 |
| 18 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 2 |
| 58% (46-33) | Career Total W/L | 56% (141-113) |
| $35,260 | Career Prize Money | $225,210 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Hontama VS Jones PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Brancaccio VS Erjavec PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats 
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1:18:58 | Average Match Time | 1:18:58 |
| 67% (42/63) | 1st Serve % | 71% (41/58) |
| 76% (32/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 71% (15/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 34% (20/58) | Return Points Win % | 25% (16/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cina vs Wong Match Preview :
Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months reveals that Wong has a slight edge, winning 47.66% of points compared to Cina's 45.85%. This measure is often indicative of a player’s ability to maintain composure and effectiveness during rallies, and is crucial for predicting match outcomes with accuracy.
Furthermore, examining the return game statistics, Cina holds a slight advantage, winning 46.84% of their opponents' second serve points compared to Wong's 43.02%. When evaluating first serve returns, Cina also excels with a 27.09% success rate, while Wong trails with 22.68%. These figures not only inform match predictions but are also essential for evaluating head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Wong has saved 55.5% of breakpoints, which is slightly superior to Cina's 53.95%. This capability to minimize losses during crucial moments makes Wong a more reliable pick for those considering in-game betting.
The overall performance from the past year depicts Cina as the more successful player, winning 62.75% of her matches, whereas Wong has achieved a 51.35% win rate. This individual win-loss record contributes significantly to head-to-head predictions.
Both players have shown Hard Courts as their preferred surface, with Wong winning 59% of their matches on this surface compared to Cina's 62%. However, Wong struggles significantly on Grass, with a 0% win rate, while Cina's weakest performance is on Clay with a 54% success rate.
When considering the player level, Wong has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving a 53.7% win rate. On the other hand, Cina has mostly engaged in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, boasting an impressive 77.78% success rate. Differences in the competitive level of their usual tournaments should be contemplated when predicting match favorites.
Regarding opponent caliber, Wong has confronted competitors with an average rank of 243.09, a significantly higher level than Cina’s opponents, who average 317.53 in rank. This disparity is an important metric to account for, as it speaks to the level of competition each player is accustomed to.
In scenarios where a match extends to a deciding set, Cina displays marginally better performance, winning 64% of these sets compared to Wong's 60% over the past year. This information is invaluable for those interested in betting on live matches, especially if the match appears closely contested.
Breaking down the breakpoint conversion, Cina converts 33.58% of opportunities, demonstrating an advanced ability to capitalize on advantageous situations, whereas Wong converts at a rate of 23.31%. These metrics frequently guide live betting predictions, especially during crucial breakpoint scenarios.
All statistical indicators, from recent form to surface success rate and breakpoint conversion, position Cina as the statistical favorite to win this matchup against Wong. However, attentive observation of ongoing event performance should not be overlooked during this assessment.
Cina vs Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Ilya Snitari
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Cina
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Federico Cina
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Federico Cina
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
54%
(
54 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
102)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
31 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Murkel Dellien
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
76%
(
69 of
91)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
119)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
119)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (46/33) | Win/Loss | 56% (141/113) |
| 58% (101/74) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (317/275) |
| 52% (869/798) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2915/2796) |
| 63% (31/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (115/80) |
| 50% (15/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 186 | Aces Total | 1332 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 199 | Total Double Faults | 515 |
| 1:41:9 | Average Match Time | 1:30:37 |
| 242.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.04 |
| 61% (3198/5247) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9466/15712) |
| 68% (2173/3198) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6676/9466) |
| 51% (1044/2049) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3025/6246) |
| 42% (242/576) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (601/1489) |
| 41% (2251/5455) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6138/15840) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 48% (12/13) | Challenger W/L | 54% (55/46) |
| 65% (32/17) | Futures W/L | 60% (72/49) |
| 58% (45/77) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (136/249) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 77% (20/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (46/84) |
| 47% (9/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (46/83) |
| 85% (47/40) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (132/115) |
| 15% (47/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (132/17) |
| 19% (32/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (122/25) |
Cina vs. Wong Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
