Federico Bondioli vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W W W L
Form
L W L W W L W W W LHead To Head: Bondioli 1 - 0 Kjaer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bondioli winning 2 and Kjaer winning 0. The last match between Bondioli and Kjaer was at the Vicenza Challenger, 26-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Federico Bondioli getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Bondioli | 1 |
| Nicolai Budkov Kjaer | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Vicenza Challenger(26-05-2025)
Federico Bondioli
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
6
3
7
5
| Bondioli | Stats | Kjaer |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (29-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (23-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 400 | Ranking | 298 |
| 397 | Highest Rank | 287 |
| 20 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 3 |
| 54% (83-71) | Career Total W/L | 61% (49-31) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $51,960 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korpatsch VS Martincova PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Smith PREDICTION Hard
Mubadala Citi DC Open - Washington wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Federico Bondioli
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:36:50 | Average Match Time | 1:36:50 |
| 69% (36/52) | 1st Serve % | 71% (55/77) |
| 81% (29/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (32/55) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (36/77) | Return Points Win % | 25% (13/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bondioli vs Kjaer Match Preview :
- Recently, Bondioli has been slightly more effective than Kjaer with second serve points, winning 45.23% compared to Kjaer's 43.01%. How crucial could this small margin be in predicting the match outcome? It suggests a slim advantage for Bondioli.
- On return games, Bondioli again edges out Kjaer with a 43.82% win rate on second serve return points against Kjaer's 42.64%. Even in first serve returns, Bondioli holds a small lead, with 29.57% compared to Kjaer's 28.74%.
- Under pressure, Kjaer leads in break point saves with 51.49% over Bondioli’s 51.41%. While the difference is narrow, Kjaer might have an edge during crucial moments.
- Both players have nearly identical match win rates over the past year, with Bondioli at 58.33% and Kjaer at 58%. Could their similar success rates indicate a closely contested match? It certainly looks likely.
- Surface performance favors Bondioli on Grass with a 75% winning record, while Kjaer excels on Indoor Hard courts with a 68% win rate. This suggests surface preference might influence outcomes based on where the match is held.
- Bondioli has played primarily at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, winning 63.93%, whereas Kjaer competes more at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level, winning 57.69%. Would the event level affect their competitive edge? Experience in tougher competitions could give Kjaer an advantage.
- Regarding opponent quality, Kjaer has faced stronger opponents with an average rank of 328.9 compared to Bondioli’s 443.53. This could suggest Kjaer is more accustomed to higher competition.
- In deciding sets, Kjaer has a slight advantage, winning 59% of them over Bondioli’s 57% in the past year.
- When it comes to converting break points, Kjaer shows superior form by converting 35.06% of chances, compared to 26.29% for Bondioli. This could be a critical factor in tightly contested games.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing second serve performance and return game effectiveness, Bondioli holds a minor edge with slightly better statistics. This marginal difference is important but not decisive on its own.
Despite facing stronger opponents and playing at a higher tour level, Kjaer maintains comparable match win rates to Bondioli. Kjaer's performance under pressure, particularly in breakpoint situations, suggests he could capitalize better during critical match phases.
Both players have their strengths on different surfaces, and without specific surface information on this match, it's challenging to predict solely based on this factor. However, Kjaer’s experience against tougher competition and superior breakpoint conversion rate are notable.
Considering these factors, Kjaer's slight advantages in handling higher-ranked opponents and superior breakpoint performance suggest he is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Bondioli vs Kjaer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Federico Bondioli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Federico Bondioli
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
80 of
111)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
35 of
40)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
16 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Jelle Sels
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Dax Donders
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
12
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Federico Bondioli
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Federico Bondioli
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Faurel
Player
Federico Bondioli
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Rudolf Molleker
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
83)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
70%
(
74 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
0
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
72%
(
86 of
120)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Amit Vales
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Lorenzo Lorusso
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (83/71) | Win/Loss | 61% (49/31) |
| 52% (181/164) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (109/76) |
| 51% (1645/1594) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (927/829) |
| 55% (27/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 52% (44/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (27/16) |
| 53% (9/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) |
| 75% (3/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 432 | Aces Total | 223 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 473 | Total Double Faults | 186 |
| 1:40:50 | Average Match Time | 1:36:7 |
| 443.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 368.06 |
| 62% (6201/10063) | 1st Serve % | 62% (3170/5118) |
| 67% (4141/6201) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2115/3170) |
| 49% (1885/3862) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1007/1948) |
| 45% (434/972) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (238/515) |
| 40% (3933/9736) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2099/5047) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 41% (14/20) | Challenger W/L | 55% (17/14) |
| 58% (69/51) | Futures W/L | 74% (26/9) |
| 54% (81/151) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (49/79) |
| 46% (21/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (14/22) |
| 57% (23/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (15/26) |
| 91% (79/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (43/39) |
| 9% (79/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (43/4) |
| 15% (75/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (37/10) |
Bondioli vs. Kjaer Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
