Federico Bondioli vs Lorenzo Comino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Federico Bondioli shows superior second serve success, claiming 44.27% of points, in comparison to Lorenzo Comino's 36.32%. Could this influence the outcome? It's a dependable indicator for match predictions.
• The return game indicates Bondioli's slight edge in winning points off opponents' second serves, at 45.59%, while Comino follows closely with 44.07%. However, Comino is more formidable on first serve returns at 30.96% against Bondioli's 27.72%.
• Under pressure, Bondioli excels at saving breakpoints, achieving a rate of 54.50% compared to Comino's 44.75%. In what situations might this advantage be crucial? Perhaps in close matches and in-play betting.
• Lorenzo Comino possesses a higher overall winning percentage over the past year at 67.24%, surpassing Bondioli's 57.33%, suggesting a more consistent performance.
• Surface preferences reveal Bondioli is most successful on grass with a 75% win rate, whereas Comino excels on clay, also with a 75% win rate. Will surface play a decisive role? Only if the match is held on these respective surfaces.
• Comino competes against higher-ranking opponents, facing an average rank of 160, while Bondioli's opponents rank on average around 400.03. Could the level of opposition Comino faces better prepare him for higher-level matches?
• In deciding sets, Comino maintains a stronger record, winning 67% of such scenarios, with Bondioli trailing at 58%. Could this resilience be a deciding factor if the match extends to a final set?

Editorial Prediction (November 7, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the crucial statistics of Federico Bondioli and Lorenzo Comino suggests notable strengths and differing competencies between the two players.

Federico Bondioli has a solid second serve, giving him an edge in service games, while also effectively managing breakpoints which could secure crucial moments in matches. He excels on grass, but since this matchup focuses beyond just one surface preference, his overall win rate, coming in lower than Comino’s, may be a factor.

On the other hand, Lorenzo Comino’s consistent performance and experience against higher-ranked opponents highlight his capacity to compete at a more challenging level, suggesting a tactical match approach honed against tougher competition. He also demonstrates stronger performance in crucial deciding set battles, a critical factor in tight contests.

Considering these insights, Lorenzo Comino is more likely to win in their upcoming match, given his recent form and experience with higher-caliber opponents.