Federico Arnaboldi vs Maximilian Marterer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W W L L
Form
W L L L W W W W L LHead To Head: Arnaboldi 0 - 1 Marterer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Arnaboldi winning 0 and Marterer winning 2. The last match between Arnaboldi and Marterer was at the French Open - Paris, 23-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Maximilian Marterer getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Arnaboldi | 0 |
| Maximilian Marterer | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(23-05-2025)
Maximilian Marterer
Federico Arnaboldi
6
4
6
1
| Arnaboldi | Stats | Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (13-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (4-4) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 185 | Ranking | 263 |
| 183 | Highest Rank | 45 |
| 25 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 4 | Titles | 15 |
| 55% (204-164) | Career Total W/L | 58% (403-286) |
| $12,090 | Career Prize Money | $1,775,910 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Moutet PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:18:0 | Average Match Time | 1:18:0 |
| 76% (35/46) | 1st Serve % | 66% (42/64) |
| 54% (19/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (29/42) |
| 64% (7/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 68% (15/22) |
| 0% (0/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 31% (20/64) | Return Points Win % | 43% (20/46) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Arnaboldi vs Marterer Match Preview :
- How have both players performed on their second serve recently? Marterer has secured 52.87% of points, whereas Arnaboldi achieved 42.96%, indicating a stronger second serve performance from Marterer.
- In returning points, Arnaboldi has a slight edge, winning 48.91% on their opponent's second serves compared to Marterer's 45.07%.
- For first serve returns, Arnaboldi stands out with 30.82%, surpassing Marterer’s 22.66%.
- Analyzing performance under pressure, Arnaboldi has saved 54.63% of breakpoints, slightly better than Marterer's 50%.
- Overall match win percentage over the last year favors Arnaboldi, who has won 56.06% compared to Marterer's 48.72%.
- Surface preference analysis reveals Marterer's primary strength is on indoor hard courts, whereas Arnaboldi excels on clay surfaces.
- Both players have engaged in similar tournament levels, but Arnaboldi's win rate of 56.45% in Challengers/ITF events is higher than Marterer's 50%.
- Who's faced tougher opponents? Marterer, with an average opponent rank of 203.95, has faced stronger competition than Arnaboldi’s 275.92.
- What are the chances if the match goes to a deciding set? Arnaboldi has a slight advantage, claiming victory in 70% of such matches versus Marterer's 63%.
- When it comes to converting breakpoints, Marterer converts 41.67% of opportunities, marginally higher than Arnaboldi's 38.06%.
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating recent performance trends, Marterer exhibits a stronger second serve, which is a crucial metric for determining match outcomes. However, Arnaboldi demonstrates better capability in returning first serves, potentially offsetting Marterer's advantage in serving.
When considering play under pressure, Arnaboldi has outperformed Marterer in saving breakpoints. Coupled with a better overall win rate in the past year, Arnaboldi appears slightly more consistent in recent competition.
The nature of the playing surface could significantly influence the outcome. While Marterer prefers indoor hard courts, Arnaboldi's adeptness on clay could be decisive if this match is played on his favored surface.
Factoring in opponent quality, Marterer has fought against higher-ranked players on average, which could contribute to a resilient play style in this match. However, Arnaboldi's advantageous record in deciding sets suggests greater strength in tight situations.
Although both players have their merits, the analysis slightly favors Arnaboldi as the likely winner, given his overall performance stability and pressure resilience.
Arnaboldi vs Marterer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Federico Arnaboldi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierluigi Basile
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Andrea Picchione
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maximilian Marterer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Maximilian Marterer
42%
(
16 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
13
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Maximilian Marterer
66%
(
101 of
152)
1st Serve %
73%
(
112 of
153)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
71 of
112)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
37%
(
56 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
59 of
153)
155
Total Points Won
150
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Federico Coria
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
57%
(
17 of
30)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
30
Total Points Won
20
|
5-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Edas Butvilas
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Maximilian Marterer
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Maximilian Marterer
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (204/164) | Win/Loss | 58% (403/286) |
| 54% (454/386) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (912/696) |
| 52% (4016/3761) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8200/7486) |
| 58% (26/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (85/65) |
| 58% (167/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (178/132) |
| 31% (11/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (125/73) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (15/16) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 715 | Aces Total | 3380 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1085 | Total Double Faults | 1127 |
| 1:26:47 | Average Match Time | 1:18:3 |
| 428.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 474.52 |
| 59% (12261/20755) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25067/40162) |
| 67% (8161/12261) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18142/25067) |
| 47% (4032/8494) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (8088/15092) |
| 45% (964/2133) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1311/3257) |
| 42% (8410/20215) | Return Points Win % | 36% (14385/39813) |
| 33% (1/2) | Slam W/L | 55% (39/32) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 39% (11/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (58/69) |
| 46% (51/60) | Challenger W/L | 59% (185/129) |
| 60% (151/101) | Futures W/L | 74% (105/37) |
| 55% (202/364) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (386/646) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 53% (50/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (152/293) |
| 57% (60/106) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (104/195) |
| 89% (194/173) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (394/346) |
| 11% (194/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (394/47) |
| 18% (174/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (295/55) |
Arnaboldi vs. Marterer Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
