Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Farhat Aleen Qamar vs Likhitha Kalava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Qamar vs Kalava analysis and find out who is favored!
Farhat Aleen Qamar vs Likhitha Kalava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Qamar has won 40.54% of points on his second serve, while Kalava has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Qamar, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kalava has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Qamar has saved 47.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kalava has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Qamar has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Kalava winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Qamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Kalava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 6/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Qamar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Kalava has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Qamar has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.5 while Kalava has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Qamar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kalava has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Qamar has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kalava has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Qamar 0 - 0 Kalava
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
53% (20-18)
Career Total W/L
31% (9-20)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Farhat Aleen Qamar | Likhitha Kalava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Farhat Aleen Qamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Farhat Aleen Qamar
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Farhat Aleen Qamar
Player
Danica Fernando
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
28 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Farhat Aleen Qamar
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Farhat Aleen Qamar
Player
Elena Giovanna Giessler
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ishwari Matere
Player
Farhat Aleen Qamar
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
55%
(
32 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Farhat Aleen Qamar
41%
(
19 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Farhat Aleen Qamar
Player
Arthi Muniyan
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Farhat Aleen Qamar
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Farhat Aleen Qamar
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Farhat Aleen Qamar
Player
Mihika Yadav
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Likhitha Kalava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sowjanya Bavisetti
Player
Likhitha Kalava
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Likhitha Kalava
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Likhitha Kalava
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anja Wildgruber
Player
Likhitha Kalava
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Likhitha Kalava
Player
Ania Hertel
60%
(
70 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
115)
4
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
4
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Amendola
Player
Likhitha Kalava
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
53%
(
39 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eleni Kordolaimi
Player
Likhitha Kalava
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Likhitha Kalava
Player
Ferdaous Bahri
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Qamar Vs Kalava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
