F. Andaloro
To Win
L. Vaccari
To Win
Fabrizio Andaloro vs Dane Sweeny Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W W W L
Form
L L L W L W L L L LHead To Head: Andaloro 1 - 0 Sweeny
They have played 2 sets in total, with Andaloro winning 2 and Sweeny winning 0. The last match between Andaloro and Sweeny was at the Tbilisi Challenger, 18-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Fabrizio Andaloro getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fabrizio Andaloro | 1 |
| Dane Sweeny | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tbilisi Challenger(18-05-2025)
Fabrizio Andaloro
Dane Sweeny
7
6
6
3
| Andaloro | Stats | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (30-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (15-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 433 | Ranking | 571 |
| 433 | Highest Rank | 194 |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 7 |
| 58% (114-83) | Career Total W/L | 54% (180-151) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $346,065 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
18 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
18 Jun 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Popyrin VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:45:47 | Average Match Time | 1:45:47 |
| 63% (45/72) | 1st Serve % | 62% (53/85) |
| 76% (34/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (32/53) |
| 44% (12/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 38% (32/85) | Return Points Win % | 36% (26/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andaloro vs Sweeny Match Preview :
- How do the players fare on second serve performance in recent times? Sweeny secures 44.97% of points, while Andaloro achieves 50.74%, indicating Andaloro's superior ability in this aspect.
- In terms of return game statistics, Sweeny captures 48.68% of opponent's second serve points versus Andaloro's 44.57%. However, Andaloro edges out on first serve returns with 29.75% compared to Sweeny's 28.18%.
- Under pressure, both players are quite similar in saving breakpoints: Sweeny at 56.62% and Andaloro at 56.98%.
- Overall performance overview indicates Sweeny has a 41.3% match win rate, while Andaloro has a significantly higher 62.5% win rate over the past year.
- Both players favor hard surfaces, with Sweeny having a 58% career win rate and Andaloro at 63% on this terrain. This could influence hard court outcomes.
- Examining player level competition over the last year, Sweeny competes mainly in ITF tournaments with a 59.09% win rate, whereas Andaloro maintains a slight edge with a 63.83% win rate in similar events.
- Sweeny has faced opponents with an average rank of 356.98, implying greater competition than Andaloro, who faces an average rank of 456.79.
- In deciding set scenarios, Andaloro has a higher success rate, winning 59% compared to Sweeny's 50%.
- Break point conversion shows Sweeny is more efficient, converting 40.44% of opportunities versus Andaloro's 35.92%.
Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their recent second serve performance, Andaloro holds an advantage with a higher point win percentage. However, Sweeny's return game statistics suggest they exhibit a solid capacity to win points off their opponent's second serve.
Both players show resilience under pressure, with almost equal breakpoint-saving capabilities. Yet, Andaloro's overall match win rate points to a form advantage over the past year.
On hard surfaces, integral to this upcoming match, both players are comfortable, though Andaloro holds a slight career edge.
Sweeny's opponents have presented tougher challenges, potentially equipping Sweeny with invaluable experience against stronger competition.
In scenarios extending to deciding sets, Andaloro appears more adept at concluding in their favor, reinforcing their competitive edge.
Factoring in these key aspects, Andaloro emerges as the likely victor in the forthcoming match, with their accumulated advantages suggesting they might have the upper hand.
Andaloro vs Sweeny Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Fabrizio Andaloro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Fabrizio Andaloro
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
51
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Antoine Escoffier
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Tuncay Duran
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Yassine Smiej
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
40
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ryuki Matsuda
Player
Fabrizio Andaloro
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Marc Polmans
50%
(
54 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
110)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
49%
(
27 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
50 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
113
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Edward Winter
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
45
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Pavlos Tsitsipas
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Dane Sweeny
48%
(
55 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
52%
(
31 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Masamichi Imamura
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (114/83) | Win/Loss | 54% (180/151) |
| 55% (251/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (403/374) |
| 52% (2228/2070) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3747/3587) |
| 65% (73/40) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (147/109) |
| 49% (40/41) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 386 | Aces Total | 719 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 419 | Total Double Faults | 1042 |
| 1:24:57 | Average Match Time | 1:38:56 |
| 428.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.84 |
| 58% (6165/10589) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13680/21791) |
| 66% (4040/6165) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (8947/13680) |
| 49% (2159/4424) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4099/8111) |
| 46% (529/1158) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (950/2213) |
| 42% (4534/10716) | Return Points Win % | 40% (8659/21395) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 48% (10/11) | Challenger W/L | 41% (49/71) |
| 59% (104/72) | Futures W/L | 64% (118/66) |
| 58% (110/191) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (177/327) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 61% (28/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (41/87) |
| 63% (42/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (69/112) |
| 88% (104/91) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (156/137) |
| 13% (104/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (156/19) |
| 24% (93/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (175/43) |
Andaloro vs. Sweeny Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
