Fabienne Gettwart vs Milena Ciocan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Mar at 03:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Gettwart vs M. Ciocan

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gettwart 1 - 0 Ciocan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fabienne Gettwart winning 2 and Milena Ciocan winning 0. The last match between Fabienne Gettwart and Milena Ciocan was at the W15 Gonesse, 11-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Fabienne Gettwart getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gettwart | 1 |
| Ciocan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Gonesse(03-11-25)
F. Gettwart vs M. Ciocan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.68% (152-121) | Career Total W/L | 45.45% (20-24) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
F. Gettwart vs M. Ciocan Match Preview:
In assessing the upcoming tennis match, recent second serve performance offers significant insight into player prediction. Over the last six months, Gettwart has won 38.02% of points on their second serve, while Ciocan has managed to capture 27.97% in this aspect. This particular statistic holds a robust correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Return game statistics further illustrate the dynamics between these players. In recent form, Gettwart has successfully won 52.26% of their opponent's second serve points, contrasting with Ciocan's slightly higher accomplishment of 56.52%. In terms of first serve returns, Gettwart has achieved 34.21% success, while Ciocan's performance registers at 31.28%. This data is influential in understanding who might be favored in this head-to-head matchup.
When evaluating players under pressure, Gettwart has saved 47.17% of breakpoints recently, while Ciocan has managed to save a slightly higher 51.72%. Such figures are invaluable for in-game betting purposes. Moreover, this statistical approach is essential for predicting tennis dynamics, indicating a player's potential resilience during critical points.
Regarding their performance over the past year, Gettwart stands out with a match-winning percentage of 60% (W/L 33/22), whereas Ciocan holds a record of 42.11% (W/L 8/11). These figures contribute to an overall head-to-head prediction overview, providing a comprehensive comparison of recent player tendencies.
Examining playing surfaces reveals that Gettwart exhibits their best career win percentage on clay at 62% (W/L 113/70), as opposed to a lesser success on indoor hard surfaces at 48% (W/L 14/15). On the other hand, Ciocan's best career surface win percentage is on hard courts at 50% (W/L 1/1), with a lower clay performance of 38% (W/L 5/8).
The competitive level they have encountered also varies. Over the last year, Gettwart has predominated in Challengers/ITF tournaments greater than $10K, with a winning percentage of 44.44% (W/L 16/20). Ciocan, however, has played predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level, with a winning percentage of 46.15% (W/L 6/7). Notably, contextualizing these stats relative to the event level they were playing at provides further insight into their capabilities.
Looking at the quality of their opposition, in the last 12 months, Gettwart has faced opponents with an average rank of 408.04, while Ciocan has competed against players averaging a rank of 242. Consideration of opponent rank aids in understanding the level of match difficulty they have navigated.
A further factor influencing match prediction is performance in deciding sets. Within the past year, if the match were to extend into a deciding set, Gettwart has emerged victorious 47% of the time, which exceeds Ciocan's corresponding figure of 25%.
Break point conversion rates serve as another vital statistic for player prediction. Recently, Gettwart has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, overshadowing Ciocan's 33.33%. This aspect is crucial for in-game predictions when a player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Considering all these statistical parameters, Gettwart emerges as the likely favorite for the upcoming match. Their superior performance metrics in essential facets such as second serve points, match-winning percentage, and greater breakpoint conversion present a compelling case for their potential victory.
Fabienne Gettwart vs Milena Ciocan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Gettwart vs M. Ciocan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:36:8 | Average Match Time | 1:36:8 |
| 64% (38/59) | 1st Serve % | 56% (41/73) |
| 68% (26/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (19/41) |
| 38% (8/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 32% (6/19) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (3/3) |
| 55% (40/73) | Return Points Win % | 42% (25/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Gettwart Recent Matches Played
M. Ciocan Recent Matches Played

F. Gettwart vs M. Ciocan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.68% (152/121) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (20/24) |
| 54.50% (339/283) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.74% (43/51) |
| 51.61% (2978/2792) | Games Win/Loss | 50.06% (440/439) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 57.89% (121/88) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 47.62% (20/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 212 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 788 | Total Double Faults | 166 |
| 1:23:13 | Average Match Time | 1:8:51 |
| 461.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 238.09 |
| 67% (9801/14547) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1282/2106) |
| 57% (5560/9801) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (769/1282) |
| 43% (2052/4746) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (345/824) |
| 49% (1002/2041) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (123/264) |
| 48% (7094/14675) | Return Points Win % | 47% (951/2003) |
| 44.04% (48/61) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 63.41% (104/60) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 55% (150/271) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 53% (21/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 53% (41/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 92% (142/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (23/19) |
| 8% (142/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (23/4) |
| 17% (131/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (21/1) |