Ezekiel Clark vs William Griffith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Clark vs Griffith analysis and find out who is favored!
Ezekiel Clark vs William Griffith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Clark has won 49.8% of points on his second serve, while Griffith has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Clark, in recent form, has won 53.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Griffith has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Clark has saved 55.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Griffith has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Clark has won 53.97% of matches played (W/L 34/ 29), with Griffith winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Clark has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 133/ 94), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 19/ 29). Griffith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 53/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Clark has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.27% of matches (W/L 31/ 18), where as Griffith has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Clark winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Clark winning 2 and Griffith winning 1. The last match between Clark and Griffith was at the M25 Decatur, 03-08-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Ezekiel Clark getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Clark and Griffith have played a deciding set 1 times, with Clark winning 1 times and Griffith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Clark winning 1, and Griffith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Clark has played against opponents with an average rank of 110.3 while Griffith has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Clark has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Griffith has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Clark has converted 43.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Griffith has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Clark 1 - 0 Griffith
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
575
Rank
469
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
638
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (162-132)
Career Total W/L
55% (54-45)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ezekiel Clark | William Griffith |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 21 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 7-6(6) 10-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ezekiel Clark | William Griffith |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (19/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (188/187) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.13 | 0 |
Aces Total | 23 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
DFs Total | 29 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:58:13 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 178.12 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (799/1164) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (513/799) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (188/365) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (55/121) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (488/1203) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ezekiel Clark Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Ozan Baris
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
2
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
40 of
48)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mikhail Gorokhov
Player
Ezekiel Clark
77%
(
89 of
115)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
51 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
93
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Louis Tessa
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adrien Gobat
Player
Ezekiel Clark
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Lewie Lane
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Marc Ros Mesas
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matej Dodig
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
106)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Louis Tessa
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
William Griffith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gage Brymer
Player
William Griffith
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Li Tu
Player
William Griffith
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 7-6(4) 10-4 | H2H |
view more