Evan Zhu vs Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L L L L
Form
W W W L W L W W W LHead-to-head: Zhu 0 - 1 Ceolin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zhu winning 0 and Ceolin winning 2. The last match between Zhu and Ceolin was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
M15 Naples(19-02-2025)
6
3
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Evan Zhu
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
5
Games Won
12
1
Aces (Total)
0
4
Total Double Faults
2
1:38:2
Average Match Time
1:38:2
60% (34/57)
1st Serve %
72% (43/60)
56% (19/34)
1st Serve Win %
70% (30/43)
43% (10/23)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (8/17)
20% (1/5)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (4/8)
37% (22/60)
Return Points Win %
49% (28/57)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Evan Zhu vs Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Evan Zhu 0 - 1 Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
- Recent performance on second serve: In the past six months, Zhu's second serve has been impeccable, winning an impressive 48.48% of the points, while Ceolin has managed to win 40.79%. The accuracy of this statistic bears a significant correlation to predicting the outcome of the match.
- Return game stats in recent matches: In recent matches, Zhu's return game has been dominant, winning a staggering 54.56% of their opponent's second serve points. Ceolin, on the other hand, has exhibited remarkable skill, winning 54.92%. Similar statistics can be observed for first serve returns, with Zhu winning 37.87% and Ceolin standing at 34.58%. These figures play a crucial role in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Analysis under pressure: When it comes to saving breakpoints, Zhu has displayed tremendous resilience, saving an impressive 56.81% in recent matches. In comparison, Ceolin has managed to save 51.81%. This statistic proves to be invaluable for making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the last year, Zhu has triumphed in 54.72% of the matches played, boasting a win-loss ratio of 29/24. Meanwhile, Ceolin has achieved a commendable 53.13% win rate, with a win-loss ratio of 17/15. These figures provide us with a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Preferred playing surface: Zhu exhibits their highest career surface win percentage on clay, successfully winning 60% of matches (W/L 71/48). Conversely, their performance on grass has proven to be less consistent, with a win percentage of 0% (W/L 0/2). As for Ceolin, their strongest performance is observed on clay, winning 51% of matches (W/L 31/30), while they struggle on hard surfaces, with a win percentage of 39% (W/L 7/11).
- Player level: Within the last year, Zhu has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level, emerging victorious in an impressive 59.52% of matches (W/L 25/17). On the other hand, Ceolin has focused their efforts on the same level of tournaments, winning 54.84% of matches (W/L 17/14). As we analyze these statistics to predict the favorite, it is important to consider the context of the events in which they have been competing.
- Opponent quality statistics: Over the past 12 months, Zhu has faced opponents with an average ranking of 443.42, while Ceolin's opponents have held an average rank of 315.03. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has been up against.
- Deciding set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, should this match reach a deciding set, Zhu has proved to be a formidable opponent, winning 56% of deciding sets over the past year. Similarly, Ceolin has exhibited exceptional skills in this scenario, winning 57% of all matches played on tour.
- Current event head-to-head stats: While evaluating past player performances is undeniably valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. Please refer to the section below for an overview of their performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players excel at specific events, and these factors should be taken into consideration when making predictions.
- Break point conversion: In recent matches, Zhu has successfully converted 48.58% of breakpoint opportunities, while Ceolin has converted 33.7% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic becomes particularly significant for in-game betting tips when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, we recommend reading this insightful article (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts).
Evan Zhu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Bazilevskiy
Player
Evan Zhu
100%
(
35 of
35)
1st Serve %
95%
(
37 of
39)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Zhu
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Evan Zhu
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Evan Zhu
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Sebastian Gima
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jackson Ross
Player
Evan Zhu
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Ioannis Xilas
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
14
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
51 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Evan Zhu
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Dan Martin
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Elie Elie Azoulay
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Evan Zhu
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Lucas Bouquet
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Oliver Okonkwo
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
51% (225/214)
Win/Loss
48% (40/43)
50% (509/516)
Sets Win/Loss
49% (91/95)
50% (4851/4805)
Games Win/Loss
49% (847/876)
50% (141/140)
Hard Win/Loss
39% (7/11)
59% (71/49)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (32/31)
36% (13/23)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/2)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.24
Aces Per Game
0.1
1154
Aces Total
82
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.16
1041
Total Double Faults
136
1:23:3
Average Match Time
1st Match
463.16
Average Opponent Rank
210.54
62% (15913/25698)
1st Serve %
64% (1492/2346)
66% (10473/15913)
1st Serve Win %
62% (931/1492)
49% (4801/9785)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (370/854)
42% (1044/2501)
Break Points Won % (Total)
37% (99/266)
40% (10137/25422)
Return Points Win %
40% (937/2367)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
20% (1/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
42% (56/77)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/2)
56% (168/133)
Futures W/L
49% (40/41)
50% (218/432)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
47% (38/81)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
52% (64/124)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (4/8)
57% (87/152)
Deciding Set Win %
39% (7/18)
83% (216/180)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (42/36)
17% (216/36)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (42/6)
20% (223/44)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
10% (41/4)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
