M. Bouzige
To Win
E. Zhu
To Win
Evan Zhu vs Ioannis Xilas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L W W L
Form
L L L W L W W L L LHead To Head: Zhu 1 - 0 Xilas
They have played 3 sets in total, with Zhu winning 2 and Xilas winning 1. The last match between Zhu and Xilas was at the Cleveland Challenger, 26-01-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Evan Zhu getting the victory 6-2 1-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Evan Zhu | 1 |
| Ioannis Xilas | 0 |
Cleveland Challenger(26-01-2025)
6
2
1
6
6
4
| Zhu | Stats | Xilas |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (9-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (2-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 619 | Ranking | 859 |
| 271 | Highest Rank | 770 |
| 26 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 51% (229-219) | Career Total W/L | 53% (74-66) |
| $3,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 1-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Evan Zhu
Player
Ioannis Xilas
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
14
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
51 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 2:4:28 | Average Match Time | 2:4:28 |
| 72% (71/99) | 1st Serve % | 59% (50/85) |
| 56% (40/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (25/50) |
| 29% (8/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
| 56% (48/85) | Return Points Win % | 52% (51/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Evan Zhu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Evan Zhu
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 0-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Evan Zhu
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Evan Zhu
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Maxime Cressy
44%
(
34 of
78)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
88)
3
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
21
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Evan Zhu
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Unknown Player
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Bazilevskiy
Player
Evan Zhu
100%
(
35 of
35)
1st Serve %
95%
(
37 of
39)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ioannis Xilas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brian Bozemoj
Player
Ioannis Xilas
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Ioannis Xilas
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
14
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
51 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Ioannis Xilas
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ioannis Xilas
Player
Joaquim Almeida
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
121)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Fiorentini
Player
Ioannis Xilas
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
54
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioannis Xilas
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Staeheli
Player
Ioannis Xilas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
110)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ioannis Xilas
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
8
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
10
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (229/219) | Win/Loss | 53% (74/66) |
| 50% (518/528) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (169/146) |
| 50% (4940/4902) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1508/1370) |
| 50% (144/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (46/45) |
| 59% (72/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (23/16) |
| 36% (13/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1162 | Aces Total | 48 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 1058 | Total Double Faults | 527 |
| 1:22:33 | Average Match Time | 1:8:26 |
| 252.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 339.37 |
| 62% (16134/26076) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3561/5837) |
| 66% (10614/16134) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2185/3561) |
| 49% (4885/9942) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (944/2276) |
| 42% (1055/2531) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (357/734) |
| 40% (10273/25789) | Return Points Win % | 46% (2766/6010) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (58/79) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (170/135) | Futures W/L | 53% (73/64) |
| 50% (222/441) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (71/136) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (65/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (11/22) |
| 57% (89/155) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (13/35) |
| 84% (219/183) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (78/66) |
| 16% (219/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (78/12) |
| 20% (229/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (62/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
