Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evan Song vs Ben Patael Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Song vs Patael analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Song vs Ben Patael Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Song has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Patael has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Song, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Patael has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Song has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patael has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Song has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Patael winning 33.33% (W/L 2/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Song has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 19/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24). Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Song winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Song winning 4 and Patael winning 0. The last match between Song and Patael was at the Israel F6, 11-05-2015, First, Hard with Evan Song getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Song and Patael have played a deciding set 0 times, with Song winning 0 times and Patael 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Song winning 0, and Patael 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Song has played against opponents with an average rank of while Patael has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Song has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patael has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Song has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patael has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Song 2 - 0 Patael
Ret.
Rank
314
High
31
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
809
Rank
379
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
52% (219-203)
Career Total W/L
59% (256-181)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$7,140
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Evan Song | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evan Song | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Evan Song Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Evan Song
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Evan Song
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Duckhee Lee
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Evan Song
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Evan Song
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
81 of
105)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Evan Song
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Evan Song
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Dennis Novikov
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
James Hopper
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Song Vs Patael Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
