Eva Vedder vs Martina Okalova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W W L
Form
W W L L L W L L W LHead-to-head: Vedder 1 - 0 Okalova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Vedder winning 2 and Okalova winning 0. The last match between Vedder and Okalova was at the W50 Spring, 18-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Eva Vedder getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
W50 Spring(18-02-2025)
6
2
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Eva Vedder
Player
Martina Okalova
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
7
1
Aces (Total)
1
0
Total Double Faults
0
1:41:8
Average Match Time
1:41:8
70% (53/76)
1st Serve %
61% (39/64)
72% (38/53)
1st Serve Win %
64% (25/39)
48% (11/23)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (12/25)
67% (4/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
25% (1/4)
42% (27/64)
Return Points Win %
36% (27/76)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Eva Vedder vs Martina Okalova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Eva Vedder 1 - 0 Martina Okalova
Having a grasp on the performance of tennis players is crucial in making accurate predictions. By analyzing various statistical insights, we can gain valuable information about the upcoming match. Let's delve into the data:
Second serve performance recent form: In the past six months, Vedder has exhibited exceptional efficiency on the second serve, triumphing in 48.71% of points. Conversely, Okalova has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 42.6%. A noteworthy correlation exists between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game stats recent form: A closer look at return stats reveals that Vedder, in recent form, has displayed superiority when it comes to winning points off their opponent's second serve, with a 55.28% success rate. Comparatively, Okalova has attained a commendable 54.69%. Similar patterns emerge when observing first serve returns, with Vedder's rate standing at 41.23% and Okalova's at 40.56%. These figures hold significant weight in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Examining a player's ability to save breakpoints offers valuable insights for in-game betting predictions. Vedder has demonstrated remarkable composure under pressure, successfully defending against 54.04% of breakpoints in recent form. Okalova, though slightly lower, has managed to save 51.26% of these pivotal moments.
Performance overview: Establishing an overall preview of the match, we analyze the players' performance in the past year. Vedder has emerged victorious in 59.42% of matches played (W/L 41/28), showcasing their prowess. Meanwhile, Okalova boasts a commendable win rate of 56.9% (W/L 33/25). These statistics contribute to the head-to-head prediction overview.
Best surface: A player's performance on specific surfaces sheds light on their strengths and weaknesses. Vedder has displayed remarkable mastery on Hard surfaces, triumphing in 59% of matches (W/L 79/55), whereas their performance on Grass courts is comparatively weaker, with a 50% success rate (W/L 2/2). On the other hand, Okalova excels on Clay courts, boasting an impressive 62% win rate (W/L 66/40). However, their performance on Hard courts diminishes slightly, with a 58% success rate (W/L 48/35).
Player level: Taking into account the event level at which players have competed is pivotal when predicting the favorite. In the past year, Vedder has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, achieving a commendable 60.34% win rate (W/L 35/23). Similarly, Okalova has primarily tested their mettle in the same caliber of Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 56.9% of matches (W/L 33/25). Thus, assessing players' statistics relative to the event level becomes essential in determining favoritism.
Opponent quality stats: Understanding the caliber of opponents faced by each player can add depth to our analysis. Vedder has frequently gone up against opponents with an average rank of 356.87, showcasing their ability to handle tough competition. In Okalova's case, their opponents have held an average rank of 336.83. These figures provide valuable context when assessing the players' performances.
Deciding set performance vs all players: For those engrossed in live predictions and betting, the performance in deciding sets becomes crucial. Vedder has proven their mettle, triumphing in 50% of deciding sets over the past 12 months. Similarly, Okalova has exhibited determination, winning 46% of all matches played on tour that have gone into a deciding set.
Current event H2H stats: While historical player performance proves valuable, current event stats offer a more accurate indication of a player's form. It is advisable to refer to the section below to gauge the players' current event performance (if they have already competed in the ongoing event). Additionally, certain players excel more prominently in specific events, and considering this aspect becomes pivotal in accurately predicting the outcome.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Vedder has displayed a commendable ability to seize crucial moments, converting 48.42% of breakpoint opportunities. Okalova, though slightly lower, has exhibited proficiency by converting 43.72% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics prove invaluable when it comes to in-game live betting, especially during critical breakpoint situations.
If you seek a deeper understanding of models for predicting tennis matches, this article provides an insightful starting point (Warning: Suitable for avid statistics enthusiasts).
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Eva Vedder
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Martina Okalova
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Solymar Colling
53%
(
59 of
111)
1st Serve %
89%
(
86 of
97)
12
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Eva Vedder
83%
(
57 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Julia Riera
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Eva Vedder
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Hanna Chang
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
76%
(
26 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
44%
(
27 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Tatiana Pieri
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Martina Okalova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Martina Okalova
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Jennifer Jackson
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tegan Bush
Player
Martina Okalova
71%
(
72 of
101)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(12) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Ava Rodriguez
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Gomez
Player
Martina Okalova
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
84%
(
52 of
62)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Martina Okalova
47%
(
56 of
120)
1st Serve %
72%
(
86 of
119)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
7
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
55 of
86)
38%
(
24 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
50 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Martina Okalova
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
53
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (229/164)
Win/Loss
60% (127/85)
57% (516/382)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (287/197)
53% (4423/3857)
Games Win/Loss
55% (2358/1933)
59% (80/56)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (48/36)
58% (137/98)
Clay Win/Loss
62% (66/40)
56% (10/8)
Indoor Hard W/L
59% (13/9)
50% (2/2)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.24
Aces Per Game
0.04
966
Aces Total
80
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.16
943
Total Double Faults
342
1:31:6
Average Match Time
1:6:16
448.67
Average Opponent Rank
405.15
58% (13366/23030)
1st Serve %
73% (6642/9148)
64% (8549/13366)
1st Serve Win %
57% (3786/6642)
48% (4680/9662)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (1119/2506)
48% (1373/2858)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (613/1257)
46% (10738/23485)
Return Points Win %
48% (4361/9050)
0% (0/1)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (5/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (131/102)
Challenger W/L
54% (69/58)
63% (92/55)
Futures W/L
68% (58/27)
58% (225/388)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (123/208)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (3/3)
47% (41/87)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
47% (14/30)
47% (54/116)
Deciding Set Win %
41% (24/59)
83% (243/202)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (127/106)
16% (243/40)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (127/20)
17% (150/26)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (85/19)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
