R. Anderson
To Win
E. Vedder
To Win
Eva Vedder vs Louisa Chirico Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W W L
Form
L L W L L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Vedder 1 - 0 Chirico
They have played 2 sets in total, with Vedder winning 2 and Chirico winning 0. The last match between Vedder and Chirico was at the W75 Rome, 28-01-2025, First, I.hard with Eva Vedder getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eva Vedder | 1 |
| Louisa Chirico | 0 |
W75 Rome(28-01-2025)
6
4
6
0
Upcoming Match
25 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Eala VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
4
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Eva Vedder
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Thaisa Grana Pedretti
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Eva Vedder
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Martina Okalova
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Solymar Colling
53%
(
59 of
111)
1st Serve %
89%
(
86 of
97)
12
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Eva Vedder
83%
(
57 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Julia Riera
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Eva Vedder
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Hanna Chang
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
76%
(
26 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Louisa Chirico
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
121)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
56 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
64 of
121)
108
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Mona Barthel
73%
(
72 of
99)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
90)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Taylah Preston
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
6
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
43)
0%
(
9 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
28)
0%
(
7 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
0%
(
-9 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
71 of
71)
0
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Louisa Chirico
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Louisa Chirico
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(14) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (231/165)
Win/Loss
56% (326/259)
58% (520/384)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (732/625)
53% (4454/3882)
Games Win/Loss
52% (6491/6101)
59% (80/56)
Hard Win/Loss
50% (125/125)
58% (139/99)
Clay Win/Loss
61% (165/104)
56% (10/8)
Indoor Hard W/L
58% (31/22)
50% (2/2)
Grass Win/Loss
38% (5/8)
0.24
Aces Per Game
0.14
974
Aces Total
870
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.33
951
Total Double Faults
2018
1:31:7
Average Match Time
1:12:58
447.34
Average Opponent Rank
458.52
58% (13458/23190)
1st Serve %
59% (18667/31549)
64% (8618/13458)
1st Serve Win %
62% (11504/18667)
49% (4722/9730)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (5742/12880)
48% (1379/2875)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (1817/3800)
46% (10809/23668)
Return Points Win %
45% (13839/30610)
0% (0/1)
Slam W/L
40% (16/24)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
45% (13/16)
33% (1/2)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (5/4)
Main Tour W/L
47% (48/55)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (133/103)
Challenger W/L
59% (236/161)
63% (92/55)
Futures W/L
81% (13/3)
58% (227/391)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (316/575)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
48% (42/88)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
57% (84/148)
47% (54/116)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (106/198)
83% (245/204)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (315/265)
16% (245/40)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (315/50)
17% (151/26)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (270/58)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Eva Vedder
View full predicted draw for Vedder
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
