Eva Vedder vs Jule Niemeier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L W L L
Form
W L W L L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Vedder 1 - 0 Niemeier
They have played 2 sets in total, with Vedder winning 2 and Niemeier winning 0. The last match between Vedder and Niemeier was at the Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, Group F, 10-04-2025, Round: Rubber 1, Surface: Clay, with Eva Vedder getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eva Vedder | 1 |
| Jule Niemeier | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, Group F(10-04-2025)
Eva Vedder
Jule Niemeier
6
3
6
1
| Vedder | Stats | Niemeier |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (17-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 30% (7-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 280 | Ranking | 152 |
| 221 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 5 |
| 58% (238-175) | Career Total W/L | 57% (215-162) |
| $9,620 | Career Prize Money | $1,669,640 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Bencic PREDICTION Grass
Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg wta
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bublik VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
22 Jun 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:24:0 | Average Match Time | 1:24:0 |
| 102% (61/60) | 1st Serve % | 66% (39/59) |
| 61% (17/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (5/20) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 58% (34/59) | Return Points Win % | 40% (20/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mana Kawamura
Player
Eva Vedder
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Eva Vedder
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Aurora Piccinini
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Eva Vedder
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Lina Glushko
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viola Turini
Player
Eva Vedder
48%
(
43 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marine Szostak
Player
Eva Vedder
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
56
|
6-7(4) 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Eva Vedder
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
14 of
34)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
44
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Jule Niemeier
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
13
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Jule Niemeier
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Jule Niemeier
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
11
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Tatjana Maria
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
83 of
119)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
57 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Jule Niemeier
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (238/175) | Win/Loss | 57% (215/162) |
| 57% (539/405) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (491/370) |
| 53% (4631/4056) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4244/3763) |
| 59% (82/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (38/49) |
| 57% (144/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (129/73) |
| 56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (31/25) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (17/15) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1023 | Aces Total | 1321 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.54 |
| 1018 | Total Double Faults | 2118 |
| 1:31:26 | Average Match Time | 1:38:17 |
| 445.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 344.27 |
| 58% (14108/24251) | 1st Serve % | 56% (14308/25510) |
| 64% (9010/14075) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9448/14281) |
| 48% (4940/10198) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5062/11240) |
| 48% (1440/2993) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1488/3171) |
| 46% (11281/24754) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11525/25431) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 60% (24/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 35% (9/17) |
| 40% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 55% (6/5) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (46/47) |
| 56% (138/110) | Challenger W/L | 63% (122/73) |
| 62% (92/56) | Futures W/L | 75% (12/4) |
| 57% (234/407) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (210/367) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (43/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (38/75) |
| 46% (56/123) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (50/113) |
| 83% (252/210) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (229/195) |
| 16% (252/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (229/34) |
| 17% (161/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (148/20) |
Vedder vs. Niemeier Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
