Eva Vedder vs Elizabeth Mandlik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W W L L
Form
W W L L L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Vedder 2 - 2 Mandlik
They have played 9 sets in total, with Vedder winning 4 and Mandlik winning 5. The last match between Vedder and Mandlik was at the Copa Colsanitas - Bogota, 29-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Eva Vedder getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eva Vedder | 2 |
| Elizabeth Mandlik | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Copa Colsanitas - Bogota(29-03-2025)
Eva Vedder
Elizabeth Mandlik
3
6
6
4
6
4
| Vedder | Stats | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (15-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (13-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 265 | Ranking | 271 |
| 221 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 25 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 8 |
| 58% (236-171) | Career Total W/L | 56% (177-140) |
| $9,620 | Career Prize Money | $317,135 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Rakhimova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Norrie VS Djokovic PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
23 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Eva Vedder
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
41%
(
46 of
111)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Eva Vedder
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(7) 7-6(5) |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
49 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
8
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 38 | Games Won | 50 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 1:25:4 | Average Match Time | 1:25:4 |
| 52% (117/225) | 1st Serve % | 50% (129/259) |
| 63% (74/117) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (91/129) |
| 50% (54/108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (60/130) |
| 35% (8/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (13/23) |
| 42% (108/259) | Return Points Win % | 43% (97/225) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vedder vs Mandlik Match Preview :
When considering the second serve performance, who holds the edge? Over the last six months, we observe that Mandlik secures 38.86% of points on her second serve, whereas Vedder edges out with 44.18%. This crucial metric often aligns closely with predicting the outcome of matches. Shifting our focus to return games, Mandlik takes the lead by winning 54.79% of her opponent's second serve points, compared to Vedder's 48.23%. Similarly, first serve return success is in Mandlik's favor at 34.87%, overshadowing Vedder's 30.44%, both useful indicators in forecasting this head-to-head encounter.
Under pressure, Vedder demonstrates a slightly better ability to save break points with a rate of 46.9% compared to Mandlik’s 45.74%. This insight can be particularly significant for those interested in in-game betting. Examining their overall performance, Mandlik has won 51.61% of her matches in the past year, whereas Vedder takes the lead with a 58.9% win rate, providing a comprehensive view of their capabilities. Both players thrive on Hard surfaces with Mandlik and Vedder boasting a 59% win rate; however, Mandlik fares much worse on I.hard (13%), and Vedder struggles most on Grass (50%).
Diving into player level participation, Mandlik navigates the Challengers/ITF circuit with a 53.49% success rate in the past year, while Vedder maintains a higher win rate of 59.68% within the same category. Contextual performance on the tournament scale further shapes the favorite in this matchup. Considering their direct head-to-head battles, the scales tip slightly towards Mandlik, having triumphed in two out of three previous clashes. Their most recent encounter at the Merida Open Akron saw Mandlik claiming a decisive 6-1, 6-1 victory, with their average match time recorded at 1:10:34.
In scenarios of extreme pressure, such as tiebreaks, Vedder has a perfect record of 2-0 against Mandlik. Yet, neither player has secured a victory in a deciding set when pitted against each other, creating intrigue should this contest go the full distance. When facing varying ranks, Mandlik’s opponents average a rank of 285.63, while Vedder competes against slightly lower-ranked players with an average of 351.22. Particularly in deciding sets across all matches in the past year, Vedder again leads with a 48% win rate compared to Mandlik's 39%.
Their breakpoint conversion rates further influence potential outcomes; Mandlik outshines Vedder, converting 40.7% of her opportunities, while Vedder stands at 36.99%. As these two athletes prepare to face off, the stats suggest a finely balanced match, yet with Mandlik's slight advantage in head-to-head and break conversions, she might just edge out a victory.
Vedder vs Mandlik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marine Szostak
Player
Eva Vedder
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
56
|
6-7(4) 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Eva Vedder
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
14 of
34)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
44
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Juliana Giaccio
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Eva Vedder
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Antonia Ruzic
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Eva Vedder
81%
(
68 of
84)
1st Serve %
95%
(
53 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Maria Timofeeva
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emily Appleton
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
8
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
59 of
113)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
41%
(
46 of
111)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (236/171) | Win/Loss | 56% (177/140) |
| 57% (532/396) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (404/334) |
| 53% (4564/3992) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3573/3212) |
| 59% (82/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (101/69) |
| 58% (142/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (66/57) |
| 56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1007 | Aces Total | 509 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 1001 | Total Double Faults | 1357 |
| 1:31:13 | Average Match Time | 1:32:29 |
| 446.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.7 |
| 58% (13870/23838) | 1st Serve % | 56% (11447/20534) |
| 64% (8859/13837) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7128/11447) |
| 48% (4853/10023) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4066/9086) |
| 48% (1419/2957) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1370/2647) |
| 46% (11118/24365) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9701/20411) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 40% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (6/5) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 56% (136/107) | Challenger W/L | 54% (97/83) |
| 63% (92/55) | Futures W/L | 72% (42/16) |
| 58% (232/401) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (174/313) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (43/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (21/60) |
| 46% (55/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (55/108) |
| 83% (250/208) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (171/150) |
| 16% (250/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (171/21) |
| 17% (157/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (146/27) |
Vedder vs. Mandlik Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
