Eva Vedder vs Anouk Koevermans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W W L L
Form
W W L W L W L L W LH2H: Vedder 2 - 2 Koevermans
They have played 8 sets in total, with Vedder winning 4 and Koevermans winning 4. The last match between Vedder and Koevermans was at the W50 Vacaria, 21-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Eva Vedder getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eva Vedder | 2 |
| Anouk Koevermans | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Vacaria(21-03-2025)
Eva Vedder
Anouk Koevermans
6
3
6
0
| Vedder | Stats | Koevermans |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (15-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (9-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 265 | Ranking | 178 |
| 221 | Highest Rank | 178 |
| 25 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 2 |
| 58% (236-171) | Career Total W/L | 61% (154-99) |
| $9,620 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zeppieri VS Gomez PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Rakhimova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vedder VS Koevermans H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Eva Vedder
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Eva Vedder
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Vedder VS Koevermans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 36 | Games Won | 33 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
| 1:34:55 | Average Match Time | 1:34:55 |
| 53% (105/199) | 1st Serve % | 67% (169/253) |
| 60% (63/105) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (99/169) |
| 51% (48/94) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (30/84) |
| 46% (16/35) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (14/30) |
| 49% (124/253) | Return Points Win % | 44% (88/199) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vedder vs Koevermans Match Preview :
When comparing the recent performance of Koevermans and Vedder in terms of second serve points, Koevermans has managed to win 41.31% while Vedder slightly leads with 44.15%. These metrics play a significant role in predicting outcomes due to their high correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Looking at return game statistics from the past six months, Koevermans has been able to win 50.26% of points on their opponent's second serve compared to Vedder's 48.47%. However, Vedder excels when it comes to returning first serves, winning 31.51% compared to Koevermans' 28.52%, suggesting an edge for Vedder in this head-to-head matchup.
In pressure situations, Koevermans shows resilience by saving 53.55% of breakpoints, while Vedder has a lower success rate at 46.97%, offering useful insights for in-game betting strategies. Breakpoint conversion stats illustrate that Koevermans has successfully converted 39.88% of opportunities, marginally better than Vedder's 39.08%, indicating Koevermans' slight advantage when capitalizing on break chances.
Over the last year, Koevermans demonstrates a superior match win percentage at 65.43% compared to Vedder's 59.72%, pointing towards a consistent performance overall. In terms of surface preference, Koevermans has a 63% win ratio on clay, but struggles on grass with no wins, while Vedder performs best on hard courts with a 59% win rate.
Examining overall match experience, Koevermans has competed against opponents with an average rank of 311.63, whereas Vedder has played against opponents ranked at an average of 359.75 over the past year. This suggests that Koevermans might have faced more challenging competition.
The direct head-to-head history shows Koevermans leading with two victories out of three encounters. Although Vedder clinched the last match on clay at the W 75 Prerov event, Koevermans holds a slight edge by winning four out of six sets played between them.
Finally, when a match goes the distance, Koevermans has demonstrated better performance in deciding sets by winning 57% over the last 12 months compared to Vedder's 48%. Overall, given these statistics and performance metrics, Koevermans appears to have a slight edge in the upcoming match and is likely the favorite to win.
Vedder vs Koevermans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marine Szostak
Player
Eva Vedder
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
56
|
6-7(4) 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Eva Vedder
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
14 of
34)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
44
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Juliana Giaccio
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Eva Vedder
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Antonia Ruzic
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Eva Vedder
81%
(
68 of
84)
1st Serve %
95%
(
53 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
65%
(
88 of
135)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
130)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
11
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
48%
(
65 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
133
Total Points Won
132
|
6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anouk Koevermans
75%
(
98 of
131)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
134)
134
Total Points Won
131
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Anouk Koevermans
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
8
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (236/171) | Win/Loss | 61% (154/99) |
| 57% (532/396) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (341/237) |
| 53% (4564/3992) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2884/2469) |
| 59% (82/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (36/23) |
| 58% (142/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (97/61) |
| 56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (21/13) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1007 | Aces Total | 355 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.53 |
| 1001 | Total Double Faults | 1389 |
| 1:31:13 | Average Match Time | 1:34:20 |
| 446.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.74 |
| 58% (13870/23838) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9174/14943) |
| 64% (8859/13837) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5667/9174) |
| 48% (4853/10023) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (2292/5769) |
| 48% (1419/2957) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1079/2121) |
| 46% (11118/24365) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7397/15064) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 40% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 55% (6/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 56% (136/107) | Challenger W/L | 64% (96/55) |
| 63% (92/55) | Futures W/L | 60% (56/38) |
| 58% (232/401) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (153/252) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (43/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (30/55) |
| 46% (55/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (39/73) |
| 83% (250/208) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (156/135) |
| 16% (250/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (156/21) |
| 17% (157/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (97/19) |
Vedder vs. Koevermans Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
