Eunji Lee vs Erika Sema Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L L W L
Form
L W W L W L L L W LHead-To-Head: Lee 1 - 0 Sema
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lee winning 2 and Sema winning 0. The last match between Lee and Sema was at the W15 Nonthaburi, 26-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Eunji Lee getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eunji Lee | 1 |
| Erika Sema | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Nonthaburi(26-03-2025)
Eunji Lee
Erika Sema
7
5
6
0
| Lee | Stats | Sema |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (18-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (12-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 505 |
| Highest Rank | 114 | |
| 23 | Age | 36 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 11 |
| 53% (50-45) | Career Total W/L | 52% (486-440) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $117,356 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Li VS Joint PREDICTION Clay
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Eunji Lee
Player
Erika Sema
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:45:28 | Average Match Time | 1:45:28 |
| 61% (36/59) | 1st Serve % | 74% (40/54) |
| 69% (25/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 48% (11/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 57% (31/54) | Return Points Win % | 39% (23/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lee vs Sema Match Preview :
In a detailed analysis of their recent performances, Lee has demonstrated a slight edge over Sema in several key areas, making them the more favored player going into this match. In terms of return game statistics, Sema has won a notable 55.75% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Lee has managed 46%. When returning first serves, the figures stand at 37.06% for Sema and 36.64% for Lee. These numbers are significant indicators when assessing the players in this head-to-head matchup.
Examining their second serve performance over the past six months reveals that Sema has secured 37.33% of the points on their second serve, while Lee has a closely matched 38.12%. This particular statistic strongly correlates with match prediction accuracy, adding weight to Lee's seemingly slight advantage. Additionally, when handling pressure situations, Lee has saved 49.15% of breakpoints, surpassing Sema's 45.93%, which could be a decisive factor in determining the outcome.
Over the last year, Sema has an overall match win percentage of 55.17% (W/L 32/26), while Lee boasts an impressive 65.71% (W/L 23/12). These performance overviews grant an insight into their head-to-head prediction. Reflecting on the surfaces, Sema's best career win percentage on hard courts is 55% (W/L 375/301), matching closely with Lee's 54% (W/L 45/39). However, recent match data shows that Lee typically prevails in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a 71.43% win rate (W/L 20/8), whereas Sema primarily participates in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 55.36% win rate (W/L 31/25).
Another angle to consider is the opponent quality faced over the past year, with Sema's opponents averaging a rank of 435.71, and Lee's slightly stronger at 383.8. In situations where matches go to a deciding set, Lee has impressively won 100% of these sets, compared to Sema's 60%. Additionally, Lee's breakpoint conversion rate is 47.37%, higher than Sema's rate of 43.13%, offering valuable insight for live betting situations.
Taking all these statistical elements into account, Lee appears to be the more likely victor in this upcoming match. Their consistency in performance, particularly in high-pressure scenarios, and higher conversion rates, combined with a stronger opponent ranking matchup, tips the scale in their favor for this encounter.
Lee vs Sema Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Eunji Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Eunji Lee
41%
(
19 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Eunji Lee
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
22 of
30)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jenna Defalco
Player
Eunji Lee
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
83%
(
15 of
18)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
14
Total Points Won
12
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Erika Sema Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Arina Varaksina
Player
Erika Sema
79%
(
77 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Erika Sema
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Erika Sema
76%
(
83 of
109)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Yexin Ma
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Erika Sema
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
42 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Yui Komada
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
16 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (50/45) | Win/Loss | 52% (486/440) |
| 51% (103/98) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (1102/1016) |
| 50% (911/909) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (9899/9313) |
| 53% (50/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (379/307) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (42/52) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (50/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 42% (15/21) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 9 | Aces Total | 358 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 21 | Total Double Faults | 1610 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 305.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 578.27 |
| 73% (672/918) | 1st Serve % | 73% (24228/33357) |
| 55% (371/672) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (13728/24228) |
| 47% (116/246) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3922/9129) |
| 53% (57/108) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2166/4396) |
| 46% (403/876) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15746/33542) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (8/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 39% (18/28) |
| 41% (15/22) | Challenger W/L | 53% (411/364) |
| 60% (35/23) | Futures W/L | 62% (47/29) |
| 53% (48/91) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (469/906) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 55% (6/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (71/160) |
| 57% (8/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (136/282) |
| 90% (50/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (488/411) |
| 10% (50/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (488/75) |
| 9% (45/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (437/67) |
Lee vs. Sema Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
