Etienne Donnet vs Alex Knaff Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W L L W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Donnet 2 - 0 Knaff
They have played 4 sets in total, with Donnet winning 4 and Knaff winning 0. The last match between Donnet and Knaff was at the M15 Nonthaburi, 29-03-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Hard, with Etienne Donnet getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Etienne Donnet | 2 |
| Alex Knaff | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Nonthaburi(29-03-2025)
Etienne Donnet
Alex Knaff
6
4
6
4
| Donnet | Stats | Knaff |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (18-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (19-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 555 | Ranking | 597 |
| 543 | Highest Rank | 486 |
| 24 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 3 |
| 63% (69-41) | Career Total W/L | 60% (219-145) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Topo VS Nava PREDICTION Clay
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Jacquemot VS Lamens PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Etienne Donnet
Player
Alex Knaff
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Alex Knaff
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 14 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:43:11 | Average Match Time | 1:43:11 |
| 60% (80/134) | 1st Serve % | 64% (78/122) |
| 78% (62/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (51/78) |
| 54% (29/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (22/44) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/8) |
| 40% (49/122) | Return Points Win % | 32% (43/134) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Donnet vs Knaff Match Preview :
Analyzing the second serve performance in recent months reveals that Knaff has an edge by winning 45.82% of their second-serve points compared to Donnet's 43.63%. The significance of this statistic is underscored by its strong correlation with accurate match predictions. This distinction provides insight into each player's ability to maintain composure under pressure against their opponent's serve.
In terms of return game prowess, Donnet shines with a 45.72% success rate on opponents' second-serve returns, slightly surpassing Knaff's 44.32%. Both players have closely matched first-serve return stats, with Donnet at 25.8% and Knaff at 25.87%, further influencing the anticipated outcome in their matchup. This highlights the strategic importance of return games in head-to-head encounters.
Knaff's ability to save breakpoints, at 53.61%, suggests an adeptness in pressure situations, while Donnet's 49.52% indicates competitive resilience. These figures are crucial for assessing potential in-game dynamics and betting scenarios. Additionally, in converting breakpoint opportunities, Donnet narrowly leads with a conversion rate of 31.54%, compared to Knaff's 30.87%, reinforcing their consistency in capitalizing on critical match moments.
The performance overview over the past year shows close match-winning percentages, with Knaff at 63.16% and Donnet slightly ahead at 64.71%. This comparative analysis provides a comprehensive view of each player's match-winning capacity. Moreover, their preferred surfaces diverge; Knaff excels on Indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Donnet's 70% win percentage on Hard courts proves formidable.
In head-to-head encounters, Donnet has dominated, winning their sole match convincingly, therefore Knaff has yet to score a victory. The match, which took place at the M 15 Nonthaburi final, saw Donnet triumph with a 6-4, 6-2 scoreline. Notably, their matches have averaged a length of around 1:44, although they have yet to play a deciding set or tiebreak.
Considering the quality of opponents faced, Donnet's average competitor ranking of 77.18 starkly contrasts with Knaff's 494.92, suggesting that Donnet competes at a higher intensity level. Furthermore, Donnet's stronger deciding-set performance, with a 73% success rate over the last 12 months compared to Knaff's 62%, adds another layer to the prediction calculus should the match reach a crucial third set.
Integrating these statistics presents Donnet as the slight favorite due to stronger head-to-head performance, superior handling of high-pressure situations, and success on preferred surfaces. If these patterns persist, Donnet appears positioned to claim victory in their upcoming encounter.
Donnet vs Knaff Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Etienne Donnet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dimitris Sakellaridis
Player
Etienne Donnet
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Makar Krivoshchekov
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Jea Moon Lee
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
15
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Alex Knaff
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Hayden Jones
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Daniel Khazime
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Alex Knaff
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alex Knaff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Igor Ribeiro Marcondes
Player
Alex Knaff
68%
(
80 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Lucas Marionneau
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Yassine Smiej
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Finn Murgett
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (69/41) | Win/Loss | 60% (219/145) |
| 59% (148/104) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (486/348) |
| 53% (1238/1089) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4204/3603) |
| 70% (50/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (107/69) |
| 50% (13/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (60/50) |
| 46% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (52/26) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 338 | Aces Total | 1060 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 282 | Total Double Faults | 880 |
| 1:29:25 | Average Match Time | 1:18:23 |
| 352.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 408.7 |
| 60% (3603/6050) | 1st Serve % | 63% (11621/18489) |
| 68% (2448/3603) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (7974/11621) |
| 50% (1219/2447) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3420/6868) |
| 43% (285/666) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (878/2013) |
| 42% (2574/6142) | Return Points Win % | 42% (7931/19088) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (6/6) |
| 50% (3/3) | Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 63% (66/38) | Futures W/L | 61% (210/135) |
| 62% (68/109) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (218/361) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 56% (14/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (49/83) |
| 68% (21/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (56/105) |
| 91% (58/53) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (211/188) |
| 9% (58/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (211/23) |
| 31% (52/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (153/30) |
Donnet vs. Knaff Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
