Ethan Quinn vs Nikola Slavic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Oct at 11:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Quinn vs N. Slavic

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Quinn 1 - 0 Slavic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ethan Quinn winning 2 and Nikola Slavic winning 0. The last match between Ethan Quinn and Nikola Slavic was at the BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm, 11-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Ethan Quinn getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Quinn | 1 |
| Slavic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm(10-11-25)
E. Quinn vs N. Slavic H2H Profile
E. Quinn vs N. Slavic Match Preview:
- How does recent second serve performance influence the match? Ethan Quinn has a slight advantage with a 49.65% win rate on second serve points compared to Nikola Slavic's 45.23%.
- Who excels in returning second serves? Nikola Slavic edges out with 46.79% success against opponents' second serves, whereas Ethan manages 45.34%.
- In terms of first serve return stats, Nikola Slavic again has a marginal lead, winning 26.41% compared to Ethan Quinn's 25.01%.
- When facing breakpoints, which player is steadier? Nikola Slavic is slightly better at saving breakpoints, with a 59.22% rate versus Ethan's 58.36%.
- Regarding overall match success in the past year, Slavic stands at a 65.71% win rate, somewhat surpassing Quinn's 62.67%.
- Both players perform best on indoor hard courts with a 61% win rate but have different challenges; for Ethan Quinn, it's clay, while for Nikola Slavic, it's hard surfaces.
- Ethan Quinn has faced stronger competition, playing against players averaging a 150.57 rank compared to Slavic's average opponent rank of 235.69.
- Will a deciding set favor one player? Yes, Ethan Quinn has a better track record in these scenarios, winning 63% compared to Slavic's 52% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match features Ethan Quinn and Nikola Slavic in an intriguing head-to-head battle. While Ethan shows a slight edge in second serve success, Slavic demonstrates superior skills in returning serves. Both players share strengths on indoor hard surfaces, but Quinn faces stronger opponents, suggesting he might be better prepared for high-pressure scenarios.
On the other hand, Nikola Slavic holds a narrow advantage in breakpoint saves and has a marginally better first serve return performance, which could be pivotal during critical game points. However, when it comes to deciding sets, Ethan Quinn shows a more robust performance, pointing towards increased resilience under pressure.
With all factors considered, Ethan Quinn is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match, given his broader experience against tougher opponents and his strong performance in deciding sets.
Ethan Quinn vs Nikola Slavic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Quinn vs N. Slavic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:8:10 | Average Match Time | 1:8:10 |
| 72% (39/54) | 1st Serve % | 57% (29/51) |
| 82% (32/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (18/29) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
| 45% (23/51) | Return Points Win % | 26% (14/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Quinn Recent Matches Played
N. Slavic Recent Matches Played

E. Quinn vs N. Slavic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.89% (132/96) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.73% (74/52) |
| 54.74% (300/248) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.34% (164/122) |
| 51.61% (2811/2636) | Games Win/Loss | 53.37% (1416/1237) |
| 58.46% (76/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.17% (12/11) |
| 52.78% (19/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (36/24) |
| 60.78% (31/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.47% (26/17) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1198 | Aces Total | 354 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 651 | Total Double Faults | 171 |
| 1:48:18 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 320.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.2 |
| 60% (10162/16932) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2900/4583) |
| 71% (7236/10162) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (2026/2900) |
| 51% (3433/6770) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (823/1683) |
| 40% (598/1496) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (177/433) |
| 38% (6402/16834) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1742/4576) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.72% (19/20) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 54.84% (51/42) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68.97% (40/18) | Futures W/L | 59.68% (74/50) |
| 58% (128/219) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (74/126) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (55/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 37% (10/27) |
| 59% (49/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (18/34) |
| 86% (125/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (72/63) |
| 14% (125/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (72/9) |
| 23% (103/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (54/11) |