E. Quinn
To Win
B. Tomic
To Win
Ethan Quinn vs Jakub Mensik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L L W
Form
W W L W W W L W W LH2H: Quinn 0 - 1 Mensik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Quinn winning 0 and Mensik winning 2. The last match between Quinn and Mensik was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 25-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Jakub Mensik getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ethan Quinn | 0 |
| Jakub Mensik | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(25-04-2025)
Jakub Mensik
Ethan Quinn
7
6
6
1
| Quinn | Stats | Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (26-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (22-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 106 | Ranking | 19 |
| 106 | Highest Rank | 19 |
| 21 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 7 |
| 58% (114-82) | Career Total W/L | 63% (138-80) |
| $356,615 | Career Prize Money | $2,707,960 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fokina VS Monfils PREDICTION Clay
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
20 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Norrie VS Machac PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
21 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Jakub Mensik
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 13 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:20:55 | Average Match Time | 1:20:55 |
| 61% (35/57) | 1st Serve % | 67% (44/66) |
| 60% (21/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (33/44) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 38% (25/66) | Return Points Win % | 44% (25/57) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Quinn vs Mensik Match Preview :
In evaluating performance metrics for Quinn and Mensik ahead of their upcoming tennis confrontation, we begin by examining their second serve efficiency over the past six months. Quinn has achieved a success rate of 47.28% on their second serve points, closely rivaled by Mensik’s 47.58%. This particular statistic is significantly linked to accurately predicting match outcomes. Additionally, the returning capabilities unveil that Quinn claims 46.01% of points on their opponent's second serve, slightly edging Mensik at 45.03%. For first serve return points, Quinn and Mensik stand at 25.11% and 23.39%, respectively, offering crucial insights for picking a favorite in this matchup.
When considering player performance under pressure, the break point save statistic is enlightening for betting predictions. Mensik saved 57.84% of breakpoints, surpassing Quinn's rate of 54.1%. Over the past year, Quinn holds a match win rate of 60% (W/L 48/32), while Mensik has attained a 58.82% (W/L 40/28), providing a general comparative overview for their head-to-head encounters. Surface preference leans towards Mensik, as they boast a 71% win rate on Hard courts, contrasting with Quinn’s 61% win rate on Indoor Hard courts.
The level of competition they face marks another differential aspect; Quinn predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF events, with a 58.7% success rate (W/L 27/19), whereas Mensik encounters more rigorous opponents on the Main tour, securing wins in 51.61% of matches (W/L 16/15). This contextualizes each player's achievements relative to the event caliber they partake in. Furthermore, Mensik consistently faces higher-ranked adversaries, with an average opponent rank of 89.59 compared to Quinn’s 228.1, enhancing Mensik's perceived competitive edge.
For deciding set scenarios, indicative of clutch performance, Quinn has triumphed in 63% of such occasions, while Mensik's success rate sits at 53%. Safe to say, if the match extends into a third set, Quinn appears favorable. Breakpoint conversion further reinforces Mensik's slight advantage, with a 28.21% conversion rate as opposed to Quinn’s 27.24%, offering pivotal leverage during critical moments in the contest.
Analyzing current and historical data collectively helps refine predictions. Taking all statistics into account, Mensik emerges as the projected victor in this highly competitive meeting, due to superior experience against top-tier adversaries, substantial success on hard surfaces, and an edge in breakpoint analytics.
Quinn vs Mensik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ethan Quinn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Mark Lajal
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
59 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ethan Quinn
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
22 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Dusan Lajovic
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
49%
(
57 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
12
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
55 of
71)
58%
(
34 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
40 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
114
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Billy Harris
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Ethan Quinn
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jakub Mensik
65%
(
85 of
130)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
19
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
54 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
43 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
34 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Fabian Marozsan
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jakub Mensik
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
7
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
50 of
62)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Alexander Bublik
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Ben Shelton
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
8
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (114/82) | Win/Loss | 63% (138/80) |
| 55% (258/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (322/209) |
| 52% (2400/2221) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2688/2421) |
| 60% (70/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (70/28) |
| 48% (15/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) |
| 61% (27/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (20/15) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.69 |
| 930 | Aces Total | 1722 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 530 | Total Double Faults | 774 |
| 1:47:49 | Average Match Time | 1:45:56 |
| 326.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 285.16 |
| 60% (8580/14321) | 1st Serve % | 59% (9436/16054) |
| 71% (6090/8580) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (7036/9436) |
| 51% (2907/5741) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3217/6622) |
| 40% (525/1314) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (608/1466) |
| 38% (5484/14260) | Return Points Win % | 38% (6188/16080) |
| 50% (4/4) | Slam W/L | 72% (13/5) |
| 64% (9/5) | Masters W/L | 67% (22/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 43% (10/13) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (21/18) |
| 55% (51/42) | Challenger W/L | 56% (36/28) |
| 69% (40/18) | Futures W/L | 72% (42/16) |
| 59% (113/193) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (131/200) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 55% (44/80) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (58/102) |
| 58% (43/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (39/72) |
| 86% (110/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (143/122) |
| 14% (110/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (143/21) |
| 22% (86/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (75/16) |
Quinn vs. Mensik Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
