Ethan Quinn vs Dusan Lajovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W W L W W L
Form
L L W W W L L L W LHead-2-Head: Quinn 1 - 1 Lajovic
They have played 5 sets in total, with Quinn winning 3 and Lajovic winning 2. The last match between Quinn and Lajovic was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 05-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Dusan Lajovic getting the victory 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ethan Quinn | 1 |
| Dusan Lajovic | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-05-2025)
Dusan Lajovic
Ethan Quinn
7
5
6
7
6
3
| Quinn | Stats | Lajovic |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (30-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (18-20) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 96 | Ranking | 137 |
| 96 | Highest Rank | 23 |
| 21 | Age | 34 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 14 |
| 58% (118-84) | Career Total W/L | 54% (535-464) |
| $524,615 | Career Prize Money | $4,963,415 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Lajal PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Aliassime VS Fritz PREDICTION Grass
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ethan Quinn
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
22 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Dusan Lajovic
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 27 | Games Won | 26 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:56:38 | Average Match Time | 1:56:38 |
| 64% (108/169) | 1st Serve % | 64% (101/157) |
| 69% (74/108) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (73/101) |
| 54% (33/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (31/56) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 34% (53/157) | Return Points Win % | 37% (62/169) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Quinn vs Lajovic Match Preview :
Let's roll out the red carpet and make way for the battle of second serves, where Lajovic and Quinn take the stage with their most reliable (or not so reliable) second serve stats. Over the past six months, Lajovic has apparently decided to make his second serve a practice session for his opponents, winning just 43.55% of the points. Quinn, on the other hand, seems to have made his second serve slightly less popular with the crowd, managing a 47.35% success rate. Experts say this number can foretell the outcome of the match, but only if you're psychic.
Speaking of umpiring clairvoyance, let's switch things up and focus on the return game stats! Lajovic has taken down his rivals' second serves a whopping 41.42% of the time, while Quinn has collected an even bigger bounty with 46.28%. When it comes to first serve returns, Lajovic's net game wins only 27.99% of points, singing to the tune of Quinn's just as shaky 24.97%. It's the kind of stat that makes you rethink your life choices right before you pick the favorite in this head-to-head extravaganza.
Now, who cracks under pressure? Saving the best for those nail-biting moments, Lajovic has managed to fend off breakpoints at an inspiring 56.13%, while Quinn has hung in there with 53.9% of saves when break point drama unfolds. If in-game predictions are your jam, this is your goldmine.
As for the epic victories and uncelebrated defeats, in the grand history of matches over the last year, Lajovic turned his rackets into tambourines, winning 41.67% of his matches. Quinn danced his way to triumph in 59.26% of all duels. They say the head-to-head matchups hold the crystal ball, but so far Quinn has the victorious sparkle in his eye with a 1-0 record against Lajovic.
This isn’t your clay club mixer; we're hitting the courts with some glitz and grit by examining the best surfaces. Lajovic brings his A-game to clay with a proud clay court history winning 59% of his battles. Conversely, the grass courts have been whispering caution to him, with only 19% of victories there. Meanwhile, Quinn throws a serving party on I.hard surfaces, capturing 61% wins, though clay courts apparently take the wind out of his sails at 50% success rates.
And when it comes to match environments, Lajovic rubs elbows with the elite on the Main Tour, bagging 42.11% of matches. Will Quinn be men’s tennis answer to a challenger circuit shark with his 58.7% win rate in Challengers/ITF tournaments? Only time will tell, but the levels at which these heroes battle surely play a huge role in picking a favorite.
Summoning head-to-head face-offs from the archives, the pair tangled once before with Quinn winning every point as if Lajovic fell asleep to the loud serenade of tennis fans in Madrid. If this matchup is prolonged, remember that Lajovic and Quinn are stalemates in deciding sets and tiebreak situations, both scoring goose eggs as if they were more interested in checking out the scenery!
Opponents’ ranks in the last year bring a twist to the tale, with Lajovic fighting foes ranked as high as 97 while Quinn has faced folks whose rank cozies up to 225.72, divulging that perhaps Quinn prefers opponents who also enjoy sipping tea in the afternoon. In deciding sets across all matches, Lajovic seems to have pushed so hard that on 38% of occasions, he breaks his own resolve. Meanwhile, Quinn goes full speed ahead, winning 63% of the classic agonizing three-set matches. In short, armed with these blockbuster stats, my predictions whisper that Quinn will pirouette to victory once again, while Lajovic's enchanted tennis ball will bounce its way back to the drawing board.
Quinn vs Lajovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ethan Quinn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ethan Quinn
72%
(
100 of
139)
1st Serve %
66%
(
101 of
153)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
66 of
101)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
41 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
59 of
153)
157
Total Points Won
135
|
4-6 6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
55%
(
107 of
195)
1st Serve %
64%
(
115 of
179)
14
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
78 of
107)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
85 of
115)
55%
(
48 of
88)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
35%
(
69 of
195)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
64 of
179)
190
Total Points Won
184
|
6-4 4-6 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Ethan Quinn
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-3 2-6 0-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 3-6 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
11
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Bernard Tomic
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Mark Lajal
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
59 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Dusan Lajovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Lajovic
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Rei Sakamoto
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Dusan Lajovic
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Dusan Lajovic
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Dusan Lajovic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Cameron Norrie
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ethan Quinn
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
22 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (118/84) | Win/Loss | 54% (535/464) |
| 55% (269/217) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1277/1147) |
| 52% (2500/2327) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11912/11467) |
| 60% (70/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (116/120) |
| 51% (19/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (344/241) |
| 61% (27/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (69/78) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 19% (6/25) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 980 | Aces Total | 3010 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 563 | Total Double Faults | 1413 |
| 1:49:3 | Average Match Time | 1:22:3 |
| 319.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.24 |
| 60% (8994/15013) | 1st Serve % | 66% (40558/61810) |
| 71% (6371/8994) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27736/40558) |
| 51% (3054/6019) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (11134/21252) |
| 40% (545/1366) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2244/5622) |
| 38% (5719/14904) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23232/61765) |
| 57% (8/6) | Slam W/L | 39% (33/52) |
| 64% (9/5) | Masters W/L | 51% (82/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 47% (18/20) |
| 43% (10/13) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (176/185) |
| 55% (51/42) | Challenger W/L | 64% (136/77) |
| 69% (40/18) | Futures W/L | 64% (90/51) |
| 59% (115/195) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (491/895) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 39% (34/88) |
| 56% (47/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (169/342) |
| 58% (45/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (158/311) |
| 86% (114/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (565/470) |
| 14% (114/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (565/94) |
| 22% (88/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (434/61) |
Quinn vs. Lajovic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
