Eryn Cayetano vs Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W W W L
Form
L W W W L W L L L LHead To Head: Cayetano 1 - 0 Aziz
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cayetano winning 2 and Aziz winning 0. The last match between Cayetano and Aziz was at the W35 Sharm ElSheikh, 16-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Eryn Cayetano getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eryn Cayetano | 1 |
| Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Sharm ElSheikh(16-04-2025)
| Cayetano | Stats | Aziz |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (19-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (6-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 478 | Ranking | 511 |
| 478 | Highest Rank | 506 |
| 24 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 7 |
| 68% (79-37) | Career Total W/L | 62% (266-165) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Paolini VS Ostapenko PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:9:11 | Average Match Time | 1:9:11 |
| 59% (26/44) | 1st Serve % | 54% (28/52) |
| 88% (23/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (16/28) |
| 61% (11/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (9/24) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (27/52) | Return Points Win % | 23% (10/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cayetano vs Aziz Match Preview :
In the wildly unpredictable world of tennis, second serves are almost like a secret handshake—except Cayetano seems to have missed the meeting. Over the past six months, they’ve managed to secure just 33.02% of their second serve points, while Aziz stands a bit taller with 41.68%. It's as if Cayetano is serving with a spaghetti noodle while Aziz wields a mighty baguette. Given the strong association between this stat and match forecasts, our crystal ball seems to favor Aziz here.
Looking at returns, Cayetano has a slight edge on handling those pesky opponent second serves at 53.59%, compared to Aziz's 52.27%. But hold your applause; when facing first serves, Aziz turns the tables with 36.79% success, outpacing Cayetano's 32.9%. Clearly, Aziz likes to play catch with those sizzling first serves and turn them into his own gourmet dish!
Now, if saving breakpoints were a cooking show challenge, Aziz would be the seasoned chef with 48.54% saved, slightly outperforming Cayetano's 44.12%. Both players seem to whip up a decent soufflé under pressure, but Aziz is the one who doesn’t let it fall as much.
On a zoomed-out view of performance, Cayetano boasts a win rate of 70.37% over the last year, winning 38 out of 54 matches. Aziz sits close by at 66.22%, with 49 wins out of 74. They’re both like tennis bouncers, turning away many challengers, but Cayetano slightly enjoys more victories.
Every athlete has their comfort zone; Cayetano loves the hard courts, where they’ve triumphed in 70% of their matches. Meanwhile, Aziz shines brightest indoors on the hard surface, winning 67% there. However, get them on clay, and Aziz turns into a careless potter with just a 59% win rate.
High-stakes arenas tell their own stories. In Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, Cayetano outshines with a 75.86% win rate, while Aziz follows with 69.57%. Both these athletes are busy bees in the world of smaller tournaments, but Cayetano buzzes just a tad more vigorously.
It's of paramount importance to consider how each player sizes up against esteemed opponents. Cayetano swings at players with an average rank of 65.39, whereas Aziz duels with those ranking around 114.77. A tougher neighborhood for Cayetano might make them the scrappier fighter.
And in those nail-biting deciding sets, Aziz squeaks out a win 56% of the time, nudging past Cayetano’s 54%. When matches hit crunch time, Aziz apparently has a fictional tennis deity whispering sweet nothings of encouragement!
We also can't dismiss break point conversion; Cayetano transforms 40.74% of their opportunities into reality, slightly better than Aziz's 38.89%. It seems neither player likes to leave breakpoints lying around untouched, especially when the stakes are high.
Tallying up these whimsical stats, it seems Aziz has a slight advantage, especially under pressure and in versatility handling different opponents. How can we deny the power of that metaphorical baguette second serve? While Cayetano will certainly make it a delightful showdown, Aziz should take the elephant-sized slice of victory cake in this matchup!
Eryn Cayetano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Eryn Cayetano
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Ksenia Zaytseva
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Edda Mamedova
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Sofiia Nagornaia
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Eryn Cayetano
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
15
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Eryn Cayetano
77%
(
81 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
102)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
54 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Elena Milovanovic
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
48
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Emma Slavikova
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Julia Adams
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Penickova
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Falei
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Mirjana Jovanovic
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
60%
(
74 of
123)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
107)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
39%
(
48 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
107)
117
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Ines Murta
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Carolyn Ansari
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
47 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Chanel Janssen
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (79/37) | Win/Loss | 62% (266/165) |
| 66% (171/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (583/400) |
| 57% (1343/1026) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4791/4127) |
| 69% (79/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (172/101) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (92/63) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 185 | Aces Total | 403 |
| 0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 458 | Total Double Faults | 1368 |
| 1:37:59 | Average Match Time | 1:39:11 |
| 414.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.56 |
| 59% (4085/6935) | 1st Serve % | 64% (16964/26455) |
| 63% (2592/4085) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (10021/16964) |
| 45% (1283/2850) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4254/9491) |
| 53% (499/950) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1914/3789) |
| 50% (3374/6811) | Return Points Win % | 49% (13324/27116) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (38/24) | Challenger W/L | 35% (9/17) |
| 77% (41/12) | Futures W/L | 64% (256/146) |
| 68% (79/116) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (258/418) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 50% (7/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (48/82) |
| 54% (15/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (73/129) |
| 92% (77/71) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (244/222) |
| 8% (77/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (244/22) |
| 21% (39/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (184/42) |
Cayetano vs. Aziz Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
