Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eric Vanshelboim vs Alexis Canter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vanshelboim vs Canter analysis and find out who is favored!
Eric Vanshelboim vs Alexis Canter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vanshelboim has won 50.25% of points on his second serve, while Canter has won 50.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vanshelboim, in recent form, has won 53.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Canter has won 48.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.59% and 23.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vanshelboim has saved 55.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Canter has saved 54.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vanshelboim has won 64.56% of matches played (W/L 51/ 28), with Canter winning 47.22% (W/L 17/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vanshelboim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 148/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4). Canter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 128/ 108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Vanshelboim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.18% of matches (W/L 40/ 17), where as Canter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.57% of matches (W/L 17/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vanshelboim winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vanshelboim winning 2 and Canter winning 0. The last match between Vanshelboim and Canter was at the M15 Indore, 10-03-2021, First, Hard with Eric Vanshelboim getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vanshelboim and Canter have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vanshelboim winning 0 times and Canter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vanshelboim winning 0, and Canter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vanshelboim has played against opponents with an average rank of 181.99 while Canter has played against players with an average rank of 85.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vanshelboim has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Canter has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vanshelboim has converted 45.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Canter has converted 42.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vanshelboim 1 - 0 Canter
403
Rank
357
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
773
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
65% (199-105)
Career Total W/L
51% (182-175)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vanshelboim VS Canter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Eric Vanshelboim | Alexis Canter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (54/69) | 55% (37/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (38/54) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/5) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (31/67) | 33% (23/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Vanshelboim VS Canter H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Alexis Canter
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eric Vanshelboim | Alexis Canter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (29/23) | 50% (11/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (243/228) | 51% (116/112) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 50 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.05 |
| DFs Total | 75 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:30 | 1:23:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 223.82 | 38.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1060/1525) | 64% (367/571) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (654/1060) | 75% (274/367) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (228/465) | 54% (111/204) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (85/172) | 56% (19/34) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (674/1548) | 33% (184/557) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (4/0) |
Eric Vanshelboim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Nikola Puntaric
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
51%
(
52 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Manish Ganesh
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
9
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Enzo Wallart
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Mathys
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Lacides
Player
Alexis Canter
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Ojakaar
Player
Alexis Canter
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Philippe Renard
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Victor Clairacq
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Alexis Canter
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
9 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Alexis Canter
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(4) 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Freddie Ridout
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Vanshelboim Vs Canter Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Eric Vanshelboim
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
