search

Enrico Becuzzi vs Nathaniel Lammons Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Becuzzi vs Lammons analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Enrico Becuzzi vs Nathaniel Lammons Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Becuzzi has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lammons has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Becuzzi, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammons has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Becuzzi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammons has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Becuzzi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Becuzzi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 9% (W/L 1/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Becuzzi winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Becuzzi winning 0 and Lammons winning 2. The last match between Becuzzi and Lammons was at the France F18 (Bagneres-De-Bigorre), 04-09-2017, Q1 round, Hard with Nathaniel Lammons getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Becuzzi and Lammons have played a deciding set 0 times, with Becuzzi winning 0 times and Lammons 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Becuzzi winning 0, and Lammons 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Becuzzi has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lammons has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Becuzzi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Becuzzi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammons has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Becuzzi 0 - 1 Lammons

Enrico Becuzzi

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

51

Age

R

Plays

0

Total

1

0

Hard

1

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

591

High

30

Age

R

Plays

Nathaniel Lammons

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

1

0

Hard

1

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L L L L W L L L L

Form

L L L W W L L L L L

6% (10-153)

Career Total W/L

54% (78-67)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Becuzzi VS Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Enrico Becuzzi Nathaniel Lammons
All H2H Matches 0 1
Sets Won 0 2
Games Won 0 12
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)

Becuzzi VS Lammons H2h Matches played

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Enrico Becuzzi Nathaniel Lammons
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Enrico Becuzzi Recent Matches Played

Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78% ( 25 of 32)
1st Serve %
68% ( 30 of 44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92% ( 23 of 25)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
71% ( 5 of 7)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 6 of 14)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
13% ( 4 of 32)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 25 of 44)
53
Total Points Won
23
L
6-0 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62% ( 58 of 94)
1st Serve %
63% ( 61 of 97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83% ( 48 of 58)
1st Serve Won
85% ( 52 of 61)
47% ( 17 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 13 of 36)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
31% ( 29 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 32 of 97)
97
Total Points Won
94
L
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65% ( 37 of 57)
1st Serve %
53% ( 32 of 60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70% ( 26 of 37)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 21 of 32)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 13 of 28)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 17 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 26 of 60)
66
Total Points Won
51
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70% ( 87 of 124)
1st Serve %
66% ( 71 of 107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78% ( 68 of 87)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 52 of 71)
51% ( 19 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
30% ( 37 of 124)
Rtn Points Won
30% ( 32 of 107)
119
Total Points Won
112
L
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66% ( 60 of 91)
1st Serve %
67% ( 54 of 81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77% ( 46 of 60)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 41 of 54)
55% ( 17 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
31% ( 28 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 28 of 81)
91
Total Points Won
81
L
6-3 5-7 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83% ( 43 of 52)
1st Serve %
74% ( 54 of 73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79% ( 34 of 43)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 34 of 54)
56% ( 5 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
25% ( 13 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 31 of 73)
70
Total Points Won
55
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62% ( 33 of 53)
1st Serve %
58% ( 25 of 43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82% ( 27 of 33)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 20 of 25)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
26% ( 14 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 16 of 43)
55
Total Points Won
41
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61% ( 36 of 59)
1st Serve %
44% ( 24 of 54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83% ( 30 of 36)
1st Serve Won
96% ( 23 of 24)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
27% ( 16 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 19 of 54)
62
Total Points Won
51
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66% ( 38 of 58)
1st Serve %
55% ( 28 of 51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76% ( 29 of 38)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 8 of 23)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 18 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 26 of 51)
66
Total Points Won
43
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72% ( 58 of 81)
1st Serve %
68% ( 50 of 74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72% ( 42 of 58)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 35 of 50)
74% ( 17 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 14 of 24)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
27% ( 22 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 25 of 74)
84
Total Points Won
71
L
4-6 6-1 6-4 H2H

Becuzzi Vs Lammons Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions