Prediction of Ena Shibahara [135th] vs Kimberly Birrell [62nd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L W L
Form
W W W L W W W L L WHead-To-Head: Shibahara 2 - 1 Birrell
They have played 7 sets in total, with Shibahara winning 4 and Birrell winning 3. The last match between Shibahara and Birrell was at the ATX Open - Austin, 27-02-2025, Second, Hard with Ena Shibahara getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ena Shibahara | 2 |
| Kimberly Birrell | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Ena Shibahara
Player
Kimberly Birrell
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Ena Shibahara
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 33 | Games Won | 35 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1:44:55 | Average Match Time | 1:44:55 |
| 58% (118/202) | 1st Serve % | 56% (120/214) |
| 69% (81/118) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (78/120) |
| 50% (42/84) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (46/94) |
| 67% (10/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (12/24) |
| 42% (90/214) | Return Points Win % | 39% (79/202) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ena Shibahara vs Kimberly Birrell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shibahara 2 - 1 Birrell
Editorial Prediction:
When analyzing the performance of Shibahara and Birrell over the last six months, Shibahara has succeeded in winning 43.48% of points on her second serve, whereas Birrell has managed a higher percentage of 50.32%. This statistic closely aligns with the accuracy of match outcome predictions.
In terms of return game statistics, Shibahara has shown solid performance by winning 52.02% of her opponents' second serve points, while Birrell outpaces her with a better win rate of 54.92%. For first serve returns, Shibahara stands at 38.97% compared to Birrell's 36.82%, which can influence predictions in their head-to-head (H2H) matchups.
Assessing play under pressure, Shibahara has successfully saved 54.4% of breakpoints, whereas Birrell has a slightly higher breakpoint saving rate of 56.25%. These figures are pivotal for making betting predictions during matches.
Their overall performance over the past year shows Shibahara with a win rate of 67.74% (W/L 42/20) and Birrell closely behind at 66.67% (W/L 54/27). This provides a comprehensive overview for head-to-head predictions.
Examining surface preferences, Shibahara performs best on indoor hard courts with a win rate of 68% (W/L 13/6), while she struggles on clay at 50% (W/L 11/11). Birrell excels on hard courts, holding a win rate of 58% (W/L 174/126) but has a weaker performance on indoor hard courts at 23% (W/L 3/10).
Considering the level of competition, Shibahara has played most frequently in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, holding a win percentage of 66.67% (W/L 24/12), while Birrell shows a 65.79% win rate (W/L 25/13) under similar tournament conditions. The event level they compete at significantly impacts predicting a favorite.
In their direct head-to-head encounters, Shibahara and Birrell are evenly matched with one win each out of their two matches, and each has taken two sets out of a total of four played. Shibahara won their most recent match at the Guadalajara Open Akron with a score of 6-4, 7-6(4), lasting an average duration of 1:31:19 in their matchups.
Though neither player has been pushed to a deciding set in their past head-to-head battles, Shibahara boasts a 71% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, compared to Birrell's 63%, potentially offering an edge in a close match scenario.
Shibahara and Birrell have faced similarly ranked opponents, with Shibahara's average opponent ranked at 255.24 and Birrell's at 227.94. This illustrates their relative experience levels.
Shibahara has successfully converted 42.11% of her breakpoint chances, closely trailing Birrell's conversion rate of 45.15%, displaying their proficiency in turning opportunities into game points. Given these statistics and recent performance trends, Birrell may have a statistical edge, potentially suggesting her as the likely victor in their upcoming match.
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Ena Shibahara
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
103%
(
61 of
59)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
88)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
56 of
138)
128
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
95%
(
76 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
86%
(
19 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Ena Shibahara
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Hanna Chang
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Ena Shibahara
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Ena Shibahara
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Ena Shibahara
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
107)
2
Aces
12
11
Double Faults
8
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Kimberly Birrell
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Kaja Juvan
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Yuliana Lizarazo
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
122%
(
56 of
46)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Kimberly Birrell
113%
(
81 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Anastasia Potapova
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
3
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harriet Dart
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Viktorija Golubic
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Cristina Bucsa
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Kristina Penickova
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (145/102) | Win/Loss | 56% (242/194) |
| 57% (324/248) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (554/474) |
| 53% (2793/2465) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4993/4672) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 587 | Aces Total | 738 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 604 | Total Double Faults | 1567 |
| 1:23:51 | Average Match Time | 1:35:52 |
| 410.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.56 |
| 63% (8640/13818) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17165/27195) |
| 64% (5559/8620) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10894/17165) |
| 48% (2527/5254) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4555/10033) |
| 45% (723/1592) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1562/3422) |
| 44% (6104/13936) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12512/27868) |
| 59% (142/242) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (238/430) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 59% (32/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (57/117) |
| 55% (46/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (85/156) |
| 86% (145/125) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (227/195) |
| 13% (145/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (227/32) |
| 19% (102/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (209/46) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Kimberly Birrell
View full predicted draw for Birrell in Madrid
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
