Ena Shibahara vs Julia Grabher Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W W L L
Form
W W W L L W W L L LHead-To-Head: Shibahara 1 - 0 Grabher
They have played 2 sets in total, with Shibahara winning 2 and Grabher winning 0. The last match between Shibahara and Grabher was at the Open delle Puglie - Bari, 03-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Ena Shibahara getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ena Shibahara | 1 |
| Julia Grabher | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Open delle Puglie - Bari(03-06-2025)
Ena Shibahara
Julia Grabher
6
2
7
5
| Shibahara | Stats | Grabher |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (21-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (32-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 120 | Ranking | 139 |
| 119 | Highest Rank | 54 |
| 27 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 17 |
| 59% (158-112) | Career Total W/L | 60% (396-263) |
| $250,548 | Career Prize Money | $402,254 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:52 | Average Match Time | 1:35:52 |
| 71% (46/65) | 1st Serve % | 60% (36/60) |
| 63% (29/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (14/36) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 53% (32/60) | Return Points Win % | 42% (27/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shibahara vs Grabher Match Preview :
- Grabher has been winning 38.34% of points on their second serve recently, as compared to Shibahara's 47.33%. Does this give Shibahara an advantage in serve reliability? Likely yes, given the significant disparity.
- When returning against their opponent's second serve, Grabher has a success rate of 46.71%, slightly lower than Shibahara's 48.75%. For first serve returns, their rates are closely matched, with Grabher at 30.97% and Shibahara at 31.18%.
- Under pressure, Shibahara has saved 51.05% of breakpoints, surpassing Grabher's 45.22%. Could this resilience indicate a slight edge for Shibahara when facing critical moments?
- In the past year, Grabher has a better match win rate of 64.56% versus Shibahara's 61.54%, suggesting consistent performance at their respective levels.
- Surface preferences vary, with Grabher excelling on clay (65% win rate) and struggling on grass, while Shibahara performs best on indoor hard courts (67% win rate) but is balanced across surfaces overall.
- Both players have predominantly competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments, but Grabher has a better success rate of 76.19%, compared to Shibahara's 60% in similar events.
- In the deciding sets, Shibahara shows more stamina, winning 59% of such sets, higher than Grabher's 47% win rate.
- Despite having comparable breakpoint conversion rates (Grabher 37.5%, Shibahara 37.1%), Shibahara's overall performance against higher-ranked opponents might give her an edge.
Editorial Prediction (June 2, 2025, UTC):
Shibahara demonstrates stronger skills in crucial areas such as second serve effectiveness and breakpoint saving, indicating her potential advantage in maintaining momentum during matches.
While Grabher has shown consistent performance with an impressive match win rate over the past year, Shibahara's ability to perform well against higher-ranked opponents and her resilience in pressure situations might be pivotal.
Considering these factors, Shibahara is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Shibahara vs Grabher Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Ena Shibahara
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Ena Shibahara
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
64%
(
85 of
132)
1st Serve %
58%
(
71 of
122)
13
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
50 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
132
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Stefanie Voegele
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Ena Shibahara
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Ena Shibahara
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Julia Grabher
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (158/112) | Win/Loss | 60% (396/263) |
| 57% (356/273) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (876/617) |
| 53% (3081/2721) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7280/6212) |
| 59% (109/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (30/36) |
| 53% (17/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (346/186) |
| 69% (24/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (19/36) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 684 | Aces Total | 693 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 676 | Total Double Faults | 2464 |
| 1:26:1 | Average Match Time | 1:21:51 |
| 412.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 473.95 |
| 62% (9702/15578) | 1st Serve % | 65% (23892/36955) |
| 65% (6268/9682) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (14873/23892) |
| 48% (2868/5952) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5824/13061) |
| 45% (812/1801) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2386/4870) |
| 44% (6870/15710) | Return Points Win % | 47% (17616/37573) |
| 64% (7/4) | Slam W/L | 36% (10/18) |
| 43% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 47% (8/9) |
| 75% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 43% (20/26) | Main Tour W/L | 34% (20/38) |
| 62% (125/77) | Challenger W/L | 63% (255/150) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 74% (96/33) |
| 58% (155/265) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (389/646) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 58% (35/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (64/130) |
| 54% (51/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (96/182) |
| 87% (157/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (386/345) |
| 13% (157/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (386/40) |
| 19% (113/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (273/53) |
Shibahara vs. Grabher Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
