Ena Shibahara vs Hanne Vandewinkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L L W L W L L W L
Form
W L L L W L W W W LHead To Head: Shibahara 1 - 0 Vandewinkel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Shibahara winning 2 and Vandewinkel winning 1. The last match between Shibahara and Vandewinkel was at the W75 Prague, 10-05-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Ena Shibahara getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ena Shibahara | 1 |
Hanne Vandewinkel | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Prague(10-05-2025)
Shibahara | Stats | Vandewinkel |
---|---|---|
53% (19-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (25-13) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
123 | Ranking | 175 |
119 | Highest Rank | 175 |
27 | Age | 21 |
R | Plays | - |
1 | Titles | 9 |
59% (156-110) | Career Total W/L | 69% (166-76) |
$250,548 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kovacevic VS Tomic PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / Q3
Yunchaokete VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Shibahara VS Vandewinkel H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 0-6 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Ena Shibahara
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
52%
(
38 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
76
|
Shibahara VS Vandewinkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
12 | Games Won | 13 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
1:53:16 | Average Match Time | 1:53:16 |
47% (34/73) | 1st Serve % | 66% (46/70) |
65% (22/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (27/46) |
33% (13/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
30% (3/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
46% (32/70) | Return Points Win % | 52% (38/73) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shibahara vs Vandewinkel Match Preview :
- Vandewinkel's second serve performance sees a win percentage of 39.63% in recent matches, while Shibahara outperforms at 47.05%. Is this a significant indicator? It often correlates with match outcomes.
- Examining return games, Vandewinkel wins 51.3% of opponents' second serves, whereas Shibahara achieves 47.38%. On first serves, Vandewinkel also leads with 33.89% against Shibahara's 30.9%.
- Under pressure, Shibahara has saved 53.03% of breakpoints recently, compared to Vandewinkel's 46.49%. This could influence game predictions and betting odds.
- In overall performance over the last year, Vandewinkel has a win rate of 69.88%, slightly higher than Shibahara's 64.06%.
- Surface preferences show Vandewinkel excels on Hard surfaces with a 73% win rate, while Shibahara's strongest surface is Indoor Hard courts at 67%.
- Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF > $10K tournaments, with Vandewinkel winning 71.79% and Shibahara 64.52% of their matches in the past year.
- Considering opponent quality, Vandewinkel’s opponents have an average rank of 350.92, whereas Shibahara faces tougher competition with an average rank of 220.33.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Vandewinkel has a 71% success rate, surpassing Shibahara's 57% in similar scenarios.
- Recent form in breakpoint conversion shows Vandewinkel at 36.33%, just ahead of Shibahara's 35.94%.
Editorial Prediction (May 10, 2025, UTC):
In recent performance metrics, Shibahara holds a slight advantage in second-serve points and breakpoint saving, crucial under pressure stats. These could effortlessly influence the match's midway swings.
Vandewinkel, however, demonstrates superior return performance and a higher win rate recently. His proficiency on Hard surfaces aligns perfectly with his strengths, potentially posing challenges for Shibahara on this surface.
Match dynamics might sway if it advances to a deciding set, where Vandewinkel shows dominant performance. His experience against lower-ranked opponents could, empathetically, ease pressure despite Shibahara's successful record against stronger competition.
Cumulatively evaluating all factors, Vandewinkel's comprehensive performance and surface preference make him the favorite to win this upcoming tennis match.
Shibahara vs Vandewinkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Heather Watson
Player
Ena Shibahara
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Ena Shibahara
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ena Shibahara
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Ena Shibahara
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Hanne Vandewinkel Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Louisa Chirico
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
5
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Lea Boskovic
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (156/110) | Win/Loss | 69% (166/76) |
57% (351/268) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (356/198) |
53% (3029/2666) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2848/2231) |
59% (109/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 73% (64/24) |
53% (17/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (84/44) |
69% (24/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (18/8) |
46% (6/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
652 | Aces Total | 315 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
662 | Total Double Faults | 978 |
1:25:40 | Average Match Time | 1:47:50 |
410.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.21 |
62% (9481/15234) | 1st Serve % | 67% (10309/15435) |
65% (6111/9461) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6374/10309) |
48% (2811/5829) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2318/5126) |
45% (800/1775) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1103/2251) |
44% (6747/15386) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7738/15959) |
63% (5/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) |
43% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
75% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
43% (20/26) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
62% (125/76) | Challenger W/L | 68% (119/56) |
0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 76% (45/14) |
59% (153/261) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 69% (166/241) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
59% (34/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (25/47) |
54% (50/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (47/70) |
87% (154/134) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (152/140) |
12% (154/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (152/11) |
19% (112/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (90/26) |
Shibahara vs. Vandewinkel Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...