H. Giavara
To Win
E. Shibahara
To Win
Ena Shibahara vs Alize Cornet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W W L
Form
W W L L L L L W W LHead To Head: Shibahara 1 - 0 Cornet
They have played 3 sets in total, with Shibahara winning 2 and Cornet winning 1. The last match between Shibahara and Cornet was at the Rothesay Open - Nottingham, 15-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Ena Shibahara getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ena Shibahara | 1 |
| Alize Cornet | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Rothesay Open - Nottingham(15-06-2025)
Ena Shibahara
Alize Cornet
3
6
6
4
6
3
| Shibahara | Stats | Cornet |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (21-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (4-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 120 | Ranking | 843 |
| 119 | Highest Rank | 11 |
| 27 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (158-111) | Career Total W/L | 54% (541-459) |
| $250,548 | Career Prize Money | $6,889,944 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
08 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:15:33 | Average Match Time | 2:15:33 |
| 67% (74/111) | 1st Serve % | 62% (58/93) |
| 69% (51/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (37/58) |
| 38% (14/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 21% (4/19) |
| 44% (41/93) | Return Points Win % | 41% (46/111) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shibahara vs Cornet Match Preview :
- Cornet's recent second serve performance shows a win rate of 38.78%, whereas Shibahara has a slightly stronger performance with 47.13% of points won. Could this indicate an edge for Shibahara? Likely, yes.
- When assessing return game stats, Cornet has a slight advantage on second serve returns, winning 49.55% of points, compared to Shibahara's 48.98%.
- Considering first serve return statistics, Cornet leads with a 36.22% win rate over Shibahara's 30.85%, suggesting stronger return capabilities.
- Under pressure, Shibahara has proven more robust by saving 50% of breakpoints, whereas Cornet only saves them 28.21% of the time.
- In terms of match performance over the last year, Shibahara has a higher win percentage at 60%, compared to Cornet's 33.33%.
- On preferred surfaces, Cornet excels on Clay with a 59% win rate, while Shibahara shows strength on indoor hard courts, winning 67% of matches.
- Both players predominantly participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Cornet holding a slight recent advantage with a 66.67% win rate over Shibahara's 59.38%.
- Regarding opponent quality, Shibahara has been facing slightly tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 223.77, compared to Cornet's 236.17.
- In deciding sets, Cornet stands out with an impressive 100% win rate over the last 12 months, whereas Shibahara has a 55% success rate.
- When converting breakpoints, Shibahara shows better efficiency, converting 37.13% of opportunities against Cornet's 31.58%.
Editorial Prediction (June 14, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent form and stats, Shibahara appears to have the upper hand in several key areas. Her stronger second serve and breakpoint conversion rates indicate a potential edge in this upcoming match.
Despite Cornet's strength in deciding sets and on Clay courts, Shibahara's overall match performance and her ability to perform under pressure provide her with a likely advantage.
Given these factors, it is likely that Shibahara will emerge as the winner in this matchup, leveraging her strengths to outmaneuver Cornet.
Shibahara vs Cornet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Ena Shibahara
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
64%
(
85 of
132)
1st Serve %
58%
(
71 of
122)
13
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
50 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
132
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Stefanie Voegele
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Ena Shibahara
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Ena Shibahara
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Alize Cornet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Alize Cornet
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alize Cornet
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alize Cornet
Player
Katy Dunne
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Alize Cornet
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Alize Cornet
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Alize Cornet
52%
(
11 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
84%
(
21 of
25)
37
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (158/111) | Win/Loss | 54% (541/459) |
| 57% (355/271) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1224/1103) |
| 53% (3069/2705) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11043/10457) |
| 59% (109/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (213/190) |
| 53% (17/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (220/152) |
| 69% (24/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (71/75) |
| 50% (8/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (37/42) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 676 | Aces Total | 1478 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 674 | Total Double Faults | 3924 |
| 1:25:57 | Average Match Time | 1:15:25 |
| 412.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 415.81 |
| 62% (9657/15497) | 1st Serve % | 62% (38512/62566) |
| 65% (6236/9637) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (23869/38512) |
| 48% (2852/5916) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10304/24047) |
| 45% (809/1794) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (3723/7830) |
| 44% (6838/15626) | Return Points Win % | 46% (28525/61963) |
| 64% (7/4) | Slam W/L | 54% (86/74) |
| 43% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 47% (90/103) |
| 75% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 28% (7/18) |
| 43% (20/26) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (258/205) |
| 62% (125/76) | Challenger W/L | 63% (100/59) |
| 59% (155/264) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (527/983) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 58% (35/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (112/218) |
| 55% (51/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (182/334) |
| 87% (156/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (533/450) |
| 12% (156/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (533/83) |
| 19% (113/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (467/88) |
Shibahara vs. Cornet Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
