Emmanuelle De Beer vs Mia Jurasic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Beer vs Jurasic analysis and find out who is favored!
Emmanuelle De Beer vs Mia Jurasic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jurasic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jurasic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jurasic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jurasic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 22% (W/L 5/ 18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11). Jurasic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 9/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 9/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Beer winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Beer winning 0 and Jurasic winning 2. The last match between Beer and Jurasic was at the Maribor, 12-06-2017, Q3, Clay with Mia Jurasic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Beer and Jurasic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Beer winning 0 times and Jurasic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Beer winning 0, and Jurasic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jurasic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jurasic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jurasic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Beer 0 - 1 Jurasic
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
22% (8-29)
Career Total W/L
53% (9-8)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Emmanuelle De Beer | Mia Jurasic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 5 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Emmanuelle De Beer | Mia Jurasic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Emmanuelle De Beer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gaia Sanesi
Player
Emmanuelle De Beer
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Mia Jurasic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Alice Vicini
Player
Mia Jurasic
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
11
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
112
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tess Sugnaux
Player
Mia Jurasic
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Anastasia Vdovenco
Player
Mia Jurasic
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 ret. | H2H |
view more