Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emma Van Poppel vs Zeel Desai Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poppel vs Desai analysis and find out who is favored!
Emma Van Poppel vs Zeel Desai Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poppel has won 43.79% of points on his second serve, while Desai has won 42.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poppel, in recent form, has won 45.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Desai has won 55.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.06% and 40.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poppel has saved 48.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Desai has saved 45.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poppel has won 30.43% of matches played (W/L 14/ 32), with Desai winning 55.56% (W/L 30/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poppel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 12/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Desai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 29/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Poppel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 16), where as Desai has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Poppel winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Poppel winning 0 and Desai winning 2. The last match between Poppel and Desai was at the W15 Cairo, 04-03-2020, First, Hard with Zeel Desai getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Poppel and Desai have played a deciding set 0 times, with Poppel winning 0 times and Desai 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Poppel winning 0, and Desai 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poppel has played against opponents with an average rank of 116.2 while Desai has played against players with an average rank of 252.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poppel has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Desai has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poppel has converted 34.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Desai has converted 50.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Poppel 0 - 1 Desai
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
584
Rank
511
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
28% (33-85)
Career Total W/L
58% (174-127)
18% (2-9)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emma Van Poppel | Zeel Desai |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 3 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (22/42) | 57% (23/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (14/22) | 91% (21/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 25% (5/20) | 65% (11/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 20% (8/40) | 55% (23/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Zeel Desai
Player
Emma Van Poppel
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emma Van Poppel | Zeel Desai |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 18% (2/9) | 35% (6/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 21% (5/19) | 38% (13/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (90/137) | 46% (138/161) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 38% (6/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.49 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:21 | 1:27:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 133.27 | 265.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (398/656) | 62% (586/940) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (229/398) | 56% (329/586) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (101/258) | 41% (146/354) |
| BPs Won% Total | 29% (17/59) | 52% (63/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (214/608) | 46% (461/999) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 36% (5/9) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 18% (2/11) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Emma Van Poppel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Emma Van Poppel
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Emma Van Poppel
59%
(
72 of
123)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
3
Aces
7
15
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
50 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena-Teodora Cadar
Player
Emma Van Poppel
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Grubor
Player
Emma Van Poppel
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jada Bui
Player
Emma Van Poppel
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Potocnik
Player
Emma Van Poppel
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Emma Van Poppel
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Van Poppel
Player
Tatyana Nikolenko
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
65 of
82)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
5
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna Sedysheva
Player
Emma Van Poppel
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zeel Desai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arabella Koller
Player
Zeel Desai
89%
(
56 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Zeel Desai
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Akiko Omae
Player
Zeel Desai
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ankita Raina
Player
Zeel Desai
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Vaidehi Chaudhari
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Zeel Desai
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Tyra Lithiby
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Zeel Desai
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Zeel Desai
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
7 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
40%
(
20 of
50)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Poppel Vs Desai Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
