Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emma Raducanu vs Paula Badosa Gibert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Raducanu vs Gibert analysis and find out who is favored!
Emma Raducanu vs Paula Badosa Gibert Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Raducanu has won 47.46% of points on his second serve, while Gibert has won 45.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Raducanu, in recent form, has won 55.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gibert has won 57.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.7% and 31.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Raducanu has saved 61.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gibert has saved 67.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Raducanu has won 60% of matches played (W/L 9/ 6), with Gibert winning 54.17% (W/L 13/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Raducanu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 74/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 162/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Raducanu has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3), where as Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Raducanu winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Raducanu winning 2 and Gibert winning 0. The last match between Raducanu and Gibert was at the W25 Bolton, 05-04-2019, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Emma Raducanu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Raducanu and Gibert have played a deciding set 0 times, with Raducanu winning 0 times and Gibert 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Raducanu winning 0, and Gibert 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Raducanu has played against opponents with an average rank of 89.27 while Gibert has played against players with an average rank of 152.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Raducanu has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gibert has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Raducanu has converted 44.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gibert has converted 43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Raducanu 1 - 0 Gibert
221
Rank
10
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
101
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
66% (107-55)
Career Total W/L
64% (342-193)
60% (9-6)
YTD W/L
43% (6-8)
$3,692,397
Career Prize Money
$4,840,519
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emma Raducanu | Paula Badosa Gibert |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (37/61) | 60% (27/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (25/37) | 52% (14/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (17/24) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/8) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (24/45) | 31% (19/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Emma Raducanu
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emma Raducanu | Paula Badosa Gibert |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (9/6) | 43% (6/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (19/15) | 50% (16/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (170/147) | 50% (148/146) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.51 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:8 | 1:37:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 89.27 | 222.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (714/1068) | 57% (577/1021) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (461/714) | 68% (393/577) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (168/354) | 46% (204/444) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (59/133) | 43% (43/100) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (481/1090) | 41% (386/947) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 33% (2/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (8/14) | 55% (6/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 25% (8/2) |
Emma Raducanu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Emma Raducanu
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Angelique Kerber
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Diane Parry
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
74 of
108)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Caroline Garcia
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
9
Aces
9
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Emma Raducanu
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Dayana Yastremska
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
45%
(
5 of
11)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
18
Total Points Won
7
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Rebeka Masarova
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Emma Raducanu
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Emma Raducanu
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Simona Halep
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
0-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
45%
(
43 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
57
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
7
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Raducanu Vs Gibert Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emma Raducanu
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paula Badosa Gibert
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
