E. Raducanu
To Win
M. Kostyuk
To Win
Emma Raducanu vs Linda Noskova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W W L W
Form
W W W L L L W L W LHead-2-Head: Raducanu 2 - 0 Noskova
They have played 5 sets in total, with Raducanu winning 4 and Noskova winning 1. The last match between Raducanu and Noskova was at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Stuttgart, 18-04-2024, Second, Clay with Emma Raducanu getting the victory 6-0 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | 2 |
| Linda Noskova | 0 |
Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Stuttgart(18-04-2024)
6
0
7
5
| Raducanu | Stats | Noskova |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (8-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (11-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 49 | Ranking | 31 |
| 10 | Highest Rank | 25 |
| 22 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 7 |
| 65% (129-69) | Career Total W/L | 65% (158-84) |
| $4,432,582 | Career Prize Money | $2,058,192 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 7-5 |
Stats 
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
68%
(
75 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
115
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 32 | Games Won | 18 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:58:12 | Average Match Time | 1:58:12 |
| 70% (115/165) | 1st Serve % | 66% (112/169) |
| 68% (78/115) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (67/112) |
| 52% (26/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (22/57) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 47% (80/169) | Return Points Win % | 37% (61/165) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emma Raducanu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Emma Raducanu
78%
(
80 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Amanda Anisimova
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Mccartney Kessler
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
48%
(
13 of
27)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
11 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
41
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Emma Navarro
54%
(
60 of
111)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
51 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(6) 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Sayaka Ishii
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Emma Raducanu
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Emma Raducanu
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Maria Sakkari
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Emma Raducanu
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Bernarda Pera
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Linda Noskova
111%
(
70 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
124%
(
61 of
49)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Linda Noskova
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Linda Noskova
41%
(
23 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Linda Noskova
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jessica Pegula
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Diana Shnaider
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
16
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(8) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Yulia Putintseva
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (129/69) | Win/Loss | 65% (158/84) |
| 64% (282/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (349/218) |
| 56% (2238/1759) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2865/2497) |
| 68% (85/40) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (73/38) |
| 58% (11/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (37/25) |
| 67% (20/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (44/15) |
| 54% (13/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 570 | Aces Total | 893 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 661 | Total Double Faults | 991 |
| 1:38:38 | Average Match Time | 1:36:57 |
| 275.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 278.02 |
| 65% (8406/12898) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10742/17611) |
| 65% (5488/8406) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (7196/10742) |
| 47% (2094/4491) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3217/6869) |
| 48% (794/1656) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (914/1944) |
| 46% (5996/13013) | Return Points Win % | 43% (7459/17178) |
| 66% (23/12) | Slam W/L | 56% (14/11) |
| 50% (16/16) | Masters W/L | 58% (19/14) |
| 86% (6/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 50% (23/23) | Main Tour W/L | 65% (46/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 74% (39/14) | Challenger W/L | 70% (53/23) |
| 88% (22/3) | Futures W/L | 73% (24/9) |
| 68% (127/188) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (157/240) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 69% (31/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (47/76) |
| 53% (26/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (50/83) |
| 90% (132/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (155/136) |
| 9% (132/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (155/19) |
| 17% (66/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (87/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
