Emma Kamper Malmkjaer vs Chukwumelije Clarke Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Nov at 08:27 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Kamper Malmkjaer vs C. Clarke

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Malmkjaer 1 - 0 Clarke
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emma Kamper Malmkjaer winning 2 and Chukwumelije Clarke winning 0. The last match between Emma Kamper Malmkjaer and Chukwumelije Clarke was at the W15 Lincoln, 06-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Emma Kamper Malmkjaer getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Malmkjaer | 1 |
| Clarke | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Lincoln(11-06-25)
E. K. Malmkjaer vs C. Clarke H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.14% (28-21) | Career Total W/L | 52.94% (9-8) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. K. Malmkjaer vs C. Clarke Match Preview:
- In the past six months, Chukwumelije Clarke has slightly outperformed Emma Kamper Malmkjaer on second serve points, winning 36.32% compared to 36.01%. Could this minor difference impact the match outcome? Given the close percentages, it may play a role but not a decisive one.
- On return games recently, Clarke leads with 53.33% of opponent's second serve points won, against Malmkjaer's 50.73%. Malmkjaer, however, significantly surpasses Clarke in first serve returns with 38.47% compared to 28.95%. Could Malmkjaer's strength on first serve returns prove crucial? It could indeed be a deciding factor in her favor.
- Under pressure, Clarke has saved 48.05% of breakpoints recently, which is slightly higher than Malmkjaer's 46.89%. Will breakpoint resilience influence the match? It may lend Clarke a slight edge in crucial moments.
- Considering annual performance, Malmkjajer holds a higher match win rate at 72.73%, surpassing Clarke's 61.54%. Does this suggest a competitive advantage? Likely, as it reflects consistent form over time.
- Surface preference reveals Clarke excels on indoor hard (100%), whereas Malmkjajer has an excellent record on clay (100%). What about their weak surfaces? Clarke struggles on clay (33%), while Malmkjajer has a lower win percentage on hard courts (42%).
- In terms of player level, Clarke competes mostly at Challengers/ITF > $10K with a 42.86% win rate, while Malmkjaer dominates Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments with 81.25% wins. Does this indicate Malmkjaer is more consistent in her playing category? Indeed, it suggests greater success at her chosen circuit level.
- Regarding opponent quality, Clarke faces players averaging a 500.85 rank, as opposed to Malmkjaer's stronger opposition at 215.91. Is Malmkjaer therefore competing at a higher caliber? Yes, facing higher-ranked opponents suggests more demanding competition.
- In deciding set scenarios, Clarke holds a perfect 100% win rate over the past year, while Malmkjaer's rate is 50%. Could this affect the final outcome in a close match? Yes, Clarke's deciding set proficiency could be a decisive advantage.
- The current event performance stats could also influence the outcome, though they are not provided here.
Editorial Prediction (November 6, 2025, UTC):
Chukwumelije Clarke has demonstrated a strong record in deciding sets and a slightly higher breakpoint resilience, offering potential advantages in a closely contested match.
However, Emma Kamper Malmkjaer stands out with her impressive first serve return performance, a higher win rate over the last year, and a track record of competing against stronger opponents. These factors collectively suggest a superior competitive edge.
Considering Malmkjaer's overall performance trends and ability to challenge higher-ranked competitors, she is positioned as the favorite to win the upcoming match.
Emma Kamper Malmkjaer vs Chukwumelije Clarke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. K. Malmkjaer vs C. Clarke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:25:22 | Average Match Time | 1:25:22 |
| 64% (29/45) | 1st Serve % | 49% (36/73) |
| 69% (20/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (17/36) |
| 38% (6/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (13/37) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 59% (43/73) | Return Points Win % | 42% (19/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. K. Malmkjaer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-7(7) 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(9) | ||
SF | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
C. Clarke Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

E. K. Malmkjaer vs C. Clarke Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.14% (28/21) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.94% (9/8) |
| 59.46% (66/45) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (18/18) |
| 54.75% (548/453) | Games Win/Loss | 52.29% (171/156) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 64.52% (20/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 26 | Aces Total | 27 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.53 |
| 115 | Total Double Faults | 84 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:19:55 |
| 254.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.47 |
| 63% (1088/1737) | 1st Serve % | 55% (477/869) |
| 59% (643/1088) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (313/477) |
| 43% (279/649) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (155/392) |
| 53% (147/279) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (56/112) |
| 51% (952/1853) | Return Points Win % | 47% (387/826) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 58.82% (20/14) | Futures W/L | 71.43% (5/2) |
| 57% (28/49) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (9/16) |
| 57% (4/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 23% (3/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 84% (32/27) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (9/9) |
| 16% (32/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (9/0) |
| 6% (17/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (8/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Dalma Galfi vs Tereza Martincova Prediction – WTA W100 Dubai – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

Aliona Bolsova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets

Polina Kudermetova vs Camilla Rosatello Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets
