Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Welker vs Merna Refaat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welker vs Refaat analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Welker vs Merna Refaat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welker has won 45.83% of points on his second serve, while Refaat has won 38.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welker, in recent form, has won 57.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Refaat has won 60.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.73% and 40.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welker has saved 46.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Refaat has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welker has won 54.76% of matches played (W/L 23/ 19), with Refaat winning 48.84% (W/L 21/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 38/ 40). Refaat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 44/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 25/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Welker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Refaat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Welker winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Welker winning 2 and Refaat winning 2. The last match between Welker and Refaat was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 24-11-2022, Second, Hard with Emily Welker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Welker and Refaat have played a deciding set 0 times, with Welker winning 0 times and Refaat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Welker winning 1, and Refaat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welker has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.62 while Refaat has played against players with an average rank of 159.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welker has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Refaat has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welker has converted 44.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Refaat has converted 51.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Welker 1 - 1 Refaat
766
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
860
Rank
737
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
54% (111-94)
Career Total W/L
42% (69-97)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Welker | Merna Refaat |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 18 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (105/129) | 64% (101/158) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (63/105) | 68% (69/101) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (7/24) | 35% (20/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (6/18) | 62% (8/13) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (69/158) | 46% (59/129) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats 
Emily Welker
Player
Merna Refaat
83%
(
66 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Welker | Merna Refaat |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 45% (5/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 52% (13/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) | 52% (116/108) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.67 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 810 | 94.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (67/101) | 62% (456/738) |
| 1st Serve W% | 46% (31/67) | 60% (272/456) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 35% (12/34) | 42% (119/282) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (7/17) | 55% (53/97) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (54/112) | 49% (367/745) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 44% (4/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 44% (4/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Emily Welker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Selina Dal
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
11
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Luise Reisel
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Amelie Smejkalova
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Marija Semenistaja
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Emily Welker
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Merna Refaat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elena-Teodora Cadar
Player
Merna Refaat
74%
(
68 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Elizaveta Krokhina
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Merna Refaat
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Laura Samsonova
Player
Merna Refaat
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Kateryna Lazarenko
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
-
Aces
-
16
Double Faults
9
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
47 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
49 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Ola Abou Zekry
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
20 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Merna Refaat
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Merna Refaat
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
11
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Merna Refaat
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Welker Vs Refaat Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
