Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Welker vs Emily Seibold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welker vs Seibold analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Welker vs Emily Seibold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welker has won 45.83% of points on his second serve, while Seibold has won 44.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welker, in recent form, has won 57.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Seibold has won 62.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.73% and 42.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welker has saved 46.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seibold has saved 63.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welker has won 54.76% of matches played (W/L 23/ 19), with Seibold winning 43.75% (W/L 14/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 38/ 40). Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 35/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Welker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 6/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Welker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Welker winning 2 and Seibold winning 0. The last match between Welker and Seibold was at the W25 Hua Hin, 05-10-2022, First, Hard with Emily Welker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Welker and Seibold have played a deciding set 0 times, with Welker winning 0 times and Seibold 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Welker winning 0, and Seibold 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welker has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.62 while Seibold has played against players with an average rank of 222.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welker has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seibold has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welker has converted 44.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seibold has converted 49.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Welker 1 - 0 Seibold
766
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
878
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
54% (111-94)
Career Total W/L
54% (146-126)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
59% (10-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Welker | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (56/70) | 53% (30/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (33/56) | 53% (16/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (6/14) | 41% (11/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (30/57) | 44% (31/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Emily Welker
Player
Emily Seibold
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Welker | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 59% (10/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 63% (22/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) | 57% (165/125) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:35:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 810 | 177.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (67/101) | 60% (556/923) |
| 1st Serve W% | 46% (31/67) | 66% (369/556) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 35% (12/34) | 45% (165/367) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (7/17) | 49% (71/144) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (54/112) | 49% (482/975) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 73% (8/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 63% (10/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Emily Welker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Selina Dal
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
11
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Luise Reisel
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Amelie Smejkalova
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Marija Semenistaja
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Emily Welker
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isabelle Cherny
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Seibold
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Emily Seibold
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julieta Estable
Player
Emily Seibold
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Melany Solange Krywoj
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Ana Paula Neffa De Los Rios
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Katja Markus
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Welker Vs Seibold Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emily Seibold
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
