Emily Welker vs Chiara Di Tommaso Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welker vs Tommaso analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Welker vs Chiara Di Tommaso Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welker has won 45.83% of points on his second serve, while Tommaso has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welker, in recent form, has won 57.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tommaso has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.73% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welker has saved 46.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tommaso has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welker has won 54.76% of matches played (W/L 23/ 19), with Tommaso winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 38/ 40). Tommaso has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 18/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Welker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Tommaso has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Welker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Welker winning 2 and Tommaso winning 0. The last match between Welker and Tommaso was at the W15 Monastir, 14-03-2022, Q2 round, Hard with Emily Welker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Welker and Tommaso have played a deciding set 0 times, with Welker winning 0 times and Tommaso 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Welker winning 0, and Tommaso 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welker has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.62 while Tommaso has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welker has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tommaso has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welker has converted 44.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tommaso has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Welker 1 - 0 Tommaso
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
766
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (111-94)
Career Total W/L
43% (23-30)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Emily Welker | Chiara Di Tommaso |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Emily Welker | Chiara Di Tommaso |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 810 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (67/101) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 46% (31/67) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 35% (12/34) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (54/112) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Emily Welker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Emily Welker
Player
Selina Dal
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emily Welker
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
11
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emily Welker
Player
Luise Reisel
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Emily Welker
Player
Amelie Smejkalova
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emily Welker
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Emily Welker
Player
Marija Semenistaja
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Emily Welker
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Chiara Di Tommaso Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Ioana Zvonaru
Player
Chiara Di Tommaso
48%
(
38 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Chiara Di Tommaso
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chiara Di Tommaso
Player
Sonia Cassani
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
49 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chiara Di Tommaso
Player
Rituparna Nayak
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
-
Aces
-
14
Double Faults
11
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more