Emily Seibold vs Marie Mettraux Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W W W L
Form
W W W W L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Seibold 2 - 0 Mettraux
They have played 5 sets in total, with Seibold winning 4 and Mettraux winning 1. The last match between Seibold and Mettraux was at the W15 Bucharest, 19-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Emily Seibold getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emily Seibold | 2 |
| Marie Mettraux | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Bucharest(19-02-2025)
Emily Seibold
Marie Mettraux
2
6
6
3
6
3
| Seibold | Stats | Mettraux |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (23-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (13-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 595 | Ranking | 655 |
| 442 | Highest Rank | 604 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 55% (186-155) | Career Total W/L | 46% (143-170) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Siegemund PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
41
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 19 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:27:16 | Average Match Time | 1:27:16 |
| 71% (80/112) | 1st Serve % | 67% (84/126) |
| 63% (50/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (49/84) |
| 47% (15/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 35% (6/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 47% (59/126) | Return Points Win % | 42% (47/112) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Seibold vs Mettraux Match Preview :
Predicting Tennis Match Outcomes: Insights and Statistical Analysis
When it comes to making predictions for an upcoming tennis match, it is crucial to consider various factors and statistical data. Let's delve into some key insights and performance analysis to accurately assess the players' strengths and weaknesses.
Second Serve Performance - Recent Form: In the past six months, both players have showcased their skills on the court. Seibold, known for their consistent game, has won an impressive 47.21% of points on their second serve, while Mettraux has shown great resilience with a 43.75% success rate. This particular statistic holds a significant correlation to match prediction accuracy, offering valuable insights.
Return Game Analysis - Recent Form: Analyzing return game statistics sheds light on the players' abilities to capitalize on their opponents' serve. Seibold, in recent form, has won an impressive 54.58% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Mettraux has showcased their prowess by achieving a higher percentage of 60.92%. Comparatively, the figures for first serve returns stand at 42.08% and 41% for Seibold and Mettraux, respectively. These statistics hold a high correlation to determine the favorite in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
Under Pressure Evaluation: The ability to save breakpoints is a crucial skill, especially during in-game betting predictions. In recent form, Seibold has displayed a commendable performance by saving 45.19% of breakpoints, while Mettraux has exhibited their resilience by saving 49.48%. These statistics provide valuable insights for those interested in making informed predictions.
Performance Overview and Head-to-Head Prediction: Observing the players' performance over the past year reveals some interesting patterns. Seibold has won 54.17% of their matches (W/L 26/22), while Mettraux has achieved a 49.12% win rate (W/L 28/29). These figures give us an overall head-to-head prediction overview, setting the stage for an intriguing matchup.
Surface Preference: The playing surface can significantly impact a player's performance. Seibold has excelled on Hard courts, boasting an impressive 58% win rate (W/L 38/27). However, their performance on I.hard courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win rate of 40% (W/L 8/12). On the other hand, Mettraux has shown their prowess on Clay courts, achieving a win rate of 47% (W/L 118/132). Interestingly, their performance on I.hard courts has been relatively poor, standing at 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player Level and Event Consideration: It is essential to consider the level of events when comparing player statistics to predict the favorite. In the past year, Seibold has predominantly played in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K category, winning 46.15% of their matches (W/L 12/14). On the other hand, Mettraux has primarily participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K category, achieving a 54.35% win rate (W/L 25/21). Assessing the player's performance within their respective event levels provides a more comprehensive perspective.
Previous Encounters: The head-to-head matches between Seibold and Mettraux provide valuable insights into their prowess on the court. They have previously played once, with Seibold emerging victorious on each occasion. In the two sets played, Seibold has secured wins in both, showcasing their dominance. In their last encounter at the W15 Telde tournament on the Clay court, Seibold claimed a 6-3 6-4 victory.
Past Match Duration: Reviewing past head-to-head matches, the average match duration between Seibold and Mettraux has been insightful, lasting an average of 2 hours and 1 minute.
Predicting Deciding Set Outcomes: Seibold and Mettraux have faced each other in deciding sets on multiple occasions. Seibold has emerged victorious in all such encounters, highlighting their ability to handle pressure. Mettraux, on the other hand, is yet to secure a win in such situations. These statistics prove useful in predicting the outcome if the match goes the distance.
Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Interestingly, Seibold and Mettraux have never played any tiebreaks against each other. This absence of head-to-head tiebreak matches provides an additional layer of analysis when assessing their performance under extreme pressure.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Analyzing the quality of opponents faced over the past 12 months provides an understanding of the level of competition each player has encountered. Seibold has played against opponents with an average rank of 431.81, while Mettraux has faced players with an average rank of 372.63.
Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Observing the performance of players in deciding sets unveils their ability to thrive under pressure. Over the past 12 months, Seibold has won 29% of deciding sets, whereas Mettraux has achieved a higher success rate of 36% in all matches played on tour. These statistics offer valuable insights for live predictions and betting, especially if the match heads towards a deciding set.
Current Event Insights: While past performance possesses significant value in predicting match outcomes, it is equally essential to consider current event statistics. Paying attention to in-form players and their performance in the ongoing event provides additional indicators to predict the outcome. Detailed event-specific statistics can be found in the section below (if players have participated in the current event). Moreover, players' performance tendencies at certain events must be factored in when making predictions.
Break Point Conversion: The ability to convert break point opportunities can be a game-changer. In recent form, Seibold has demonstrated an impressive break point conversion rate of 51.38%, while Mettraux has also excelled with a conversion rate of 51.13%. This statistic proves influential for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are inclined towards thorough statistical analysis and interested in exploring models to predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point for your in-depth research.
Seibold vs Mettraux Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Emily Seibold
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Ylena In-Albon
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Ida Wobker
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Unknown Player
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-0 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Martha Matoula
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Emily Seibold
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
46%
(
32 of
70)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Charlotte Van Zonneveld
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Danique Havermans
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Marie Mettraux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Thaisa Grana Pedretti
Player
Marie Mettraux
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Mettraux
Player
Anna Maria Fedotova
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
0)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
15 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
10 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
-25 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Marie Mettraux
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Mettraux
Player
Isabella Svahn
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Mettraux
Player
Laura Cilekova
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
38%
(
12 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
58%
(
23 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
36
Total Points Won
49
|
1-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Firman
Player
Marie Mettraux
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Mettraux
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
75 of
99)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marie Mettraux
Player
Stefania Bojica
72%
(
84 of
116)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
51%
(
59 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (186/155) | Win/Loss | 46% (143/170) |
| 55% (418/337) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (323/379) |
| 53% (3520/3068) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (3048/3265) |
| 58% (38/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 33% (15/31) |
| 56% (134/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (127/135) |
| 39% (14/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 433 | Aces Total | 126 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 988 | Total Double Faults | 1043 |
| 1:17:58 | Average Match Time | 1:10:14 |
| 456.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.48 |
| 61% (9641/15927) | 1st Serve % | 66% (9185/13855) |
| 60% (5797/9641) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (5042/9185) |
| 44% (2777/6286) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (1873/4670) |
| 51% (1146/2265) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (933/1899) |
| 48% (7971/16556) | Return Points Win % | 47% (6684/14079) |
| 47% (74/84) | Challenger W/L | 33% (14/29) |
| 61% (112/71) | Futures W/L | 48% (129/141) |
| 56% (183/327) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (139/309) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 37% (17/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 32% (12/37) |
| 47% (38/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (38/78) |
| 89% (192/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (134/118) |
| 11% (192/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (134/16) |
| 12% (149/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (179/23) |
Seibold vs. Mettraux Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
