Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Seibold vs Ana Candiotto Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seibold vs Candiotto analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Seibold vs Ana Candiotto Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seibold has won 45.12% of points on his second serve, while Candiotto has won 40.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seibold, in recent form, has won 62.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Candiotto has won 52.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.51% and 38.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seibold has saved 63.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Candiotto has saved 51.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seibold has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 15/ 18), with Candiotto winning 47.69% (W/L 31/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 35/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Candiotto has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 42/ 46), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 6/ 15), where as Candiotto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.03% of matches (W/L 16/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seibold winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seibold winning 2 and Candiotto winning 0. The last match between Seibold and Candiotto was at the W25 Buenos Aires, 18-01-2023, Second, Clay with Emily Seibold getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seibold and Candiotto have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seibold winning 0 times and Candiotto 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seibold winning 0, and Candiotto 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seibold has played against opponents with an average rank of 216.03 while Candiotto has played against players with an average rank of 170.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seibold has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Candiotto has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seibold has converted 51.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Candiotto has converted 48.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seibold 1 - 0 Candiotto
878
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
582
Rank
571
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
54% (147-126)
Career Total W/L
45% (54-65)
61% (11-7)
YTD W/L
38% (6-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Seibold | Ana Candiotto |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (41/68) | 68% (41/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (27/41) | 51% (21/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (14/27) | 21% (4/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 17% (2/12) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (35/60) | 40% (27/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Emily Seibold
Player
Ana Candiotto
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Seibold | Ana Candiotto |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 38% (6/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (24/13) | 39% (14/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (177/130) | 46% (151/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 36% (4/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.6 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 97 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:6 | 1:53:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 167.56 | 204.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (588/967) | 57% (633/1102) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (391/588) | 60% (377/633) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (171/379) | 38% (179/469) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (77/150) | 48% (63/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (512/1027) | 45% (480/1069) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 30% (3/7) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isabelle Cherny
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Seibold
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Emily Seibold
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julieta Estable
Player
Emily Seibold
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Melany Solange Krywoj
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Ana Paula Neffa De Los Rios
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ana Candiotto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Candiotto
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Ana Candiotto
39%
(
20 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Ana Candiotto
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Jimar Gerald Gonzalez
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
6
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
25%
(
9 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
79%
(
11 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
59%
(
44 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Ana Cruz
42%
(
28 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Labrana
Player
Ana Candiotto
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
Player
Ana Candiotto
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Marian Gomez Pezuela Cano
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Ana Candiotto
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Maria Paulina Perez Garcia
62%
(
71 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
52 of
72)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Seibold Vs Candiotto Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
