Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Sartz-Lunde vs Kristina Paskauskas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sartz-Lunde vs Paskauskas analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Sartz-Lunde vs Kristina Paskauskas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sartz-Lunde 0 - 1 Paskauskas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sartz-Lunde has won 45.86% of points on their second serve, while Paskauskas has won 39.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sartz-Lunde, in recent form, has won 54.9% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paskauskas has won 55.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.52% and 44.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sartz-Lunde has saved 45.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paskauskas has saved 50.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sartz-Lunde has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 5/ 6), with Paskauskas winning 62.5% (W/L 10/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sartz-Lunde has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8). Paskauskas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 39/ 33).
- Player level: In the last year, Sartz-Lunde has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 4/ 4), where as Paskauskas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sartz-Lunde winning 0 times and Paskauskas being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sartz-Lunde winning 0 and Paskauskas winning 2. The last match between Sartz-Lunde and Paskauskas was at the W15 Huntsville, 15-08-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Kristina Paskauskas getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sartz-Lunde and Paskauskas have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sartz-Lunde winning 0 times and Paskauskas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sartz-Lunde winning 0, and Paskauskas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sartz-Lunde has played against opponents with an average rank of 578.73 while Paskauskas has played against players with an average rank of 308.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sartz-Lunde has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paskauskas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sartz-Lunde has converted 46.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paskauskas has converted 52.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
898
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
47% (8-9)
Career Total W/L
56% (47-37)
44% (4-5)
YTD W/L
69% (9-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Emily Sartz-Lunde vs Kristina Paskauskas For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sartz-Lunde VS Paskauskas
Sartz-Lunde VS Paskauskas H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Emily Sartz-Lunde | Kristina Paskauskas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:40:0 | 2:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (49/81) | 56% (49/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (26/49) | 67% (33/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (15/32) | 45% (17/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (37/87) | 49% (40/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sartz-Lunde VS Paskauskas H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats 
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Sartz-Lunde | Kristina Paskauskas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (4/5) | 69% (9/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (10/12) | 69% (18/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (96/104) | 54% (127/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 83% (5/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.58 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:33 | 1:37:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 573.67 | 340.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (225/358) | 59% (424/718) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (128/225) | 66% (278/424) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (61/133) | 40% (117/294) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (23/49) | 53% (49/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (178/385) | 48% (356/740) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 69% (9/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 69% (9/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (4/0) |
Emily Sartz-Lunde Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Sartz-Lunde
Player
Maria Navarro Oliva
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Sartz-Lunde
Player
Klara Kosan
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hayu Kinoshita
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Yushchenko
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Sartz-Lunde
Player
Rinon Okuwaki
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Kristina Paskauskas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Karina Miller
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Karina Miller
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Carly Briggs
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Alston Myatt
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Tenika Mcgiffin
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samira De Stefano
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Zhanel Rustemova
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Vladislava Andreevskaya
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Sartz-Lunde Vs Paskauskas Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sartz-Lunde are available here and Paskauskas photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
